Louisiana House Bill HB244

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14
• Report Pass: 3/12/14
• Engrossed: 3/19/14
• Refer: 3/24/14
• Report Pass: 5/12/14
• Enrolled: 5/20/14
• Chaptered: 5/30/14
• Passed: 5/30/14

Caption

Provides with respect to the lease of property at public postsecondary education institutions to nonprofit corporations or associations to hold fundraisers that include the auctioning and sale of firearms

Impact

The introduction of HB 244 marks a significant change in the regulation of how firearms can be showcased and sold in educational settings. It positions educational institutions as sites for fundraising events involving firearms, which may lead to debates over the appropriateness of such activities in places dedicated to learning. This amendment aims to provide a controlled environment for these events while potentially increasing the financial viability of nonprofits in the state.

Summary

House Bill 244 seeks to amend existing laws regarding the leasing of property at public postsecondary education institutions in Louisiana. The bill allows nonprofit corporations or associations to lease such properties for fundraising events that include the auctioning or sale of firearms. The legislation specifically outlines the conditions under which these events can take place, highlighting the need for campus security presence, indoor venues, and safety measures for the firearms being auctioned.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 244 may be mixed. Supporters typically view the bill as a means to support independent fundraising efforts for nonprofits, effectively broadening the scope of permissible activities on campus. However, this perspective is met with contention from those who are concerned about the implications of normalizing firearm transactions on educational properties, leading to heightened discussions about campus safety and the responsibility of educational institutions in gun regulation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the perceived risk to student safety and the influence of gun culture within educational settings. Those opposing the bill might argue that allowing firearms to be sold or auctioned on campus could contribute to an unsafe atmosphere. On the other hand, advocates of the bill may argue that the stringent conditions set forth can mitigate potential risks. Thus, the bill sparks broader conversations about the role of educational institutions in managing community values related to firearms.