2014 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE H B 85
Page 1 of 3
House Bill 85 HLS 14RS-722
Original
Author: Representative Katrina
Jackson
Date: April 29, 2014
LLA Note HB 85 .03
Organizations Affected:
Louisiana State Employees’
Retirement System
OR +$97,481,233 APV
The Note was prepared by the Actuarial Services Department of the Office of the
Legislative Auditor. The attachment of the Note to HB 85 provides compliance
with the requirements of R.S. 24:521.
Bill Header: RETIREMENT/COLAS: Provides a permanent benefit increase from the experience account to certain retired members
and beneficiaries of the Louisiana State Employees Retirement System
Cost Summary:
The estimated actuarial and fiscal impact of the proposed legislation is summarized below. Actuarial costs pertain to changes in the
actuarial present value of future benefit payments. A cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. Savings are denoted by
“Decrease” or a negative number.
Actuarial Cost/(Savings) to Retirement Systems and OGB $97,481,233
Total Five Year Fiscal Cost
Expenditures See Below
Revenues $0
Estimated Actuarial Impact:
The chart below shows the estimated change in the actuarial present value of future benefit payments, if any, attributable to the
proposed legislation. A cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. Savings are denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number.
Present value costs associated with administration or other fiscal concerns are not included in these values.
Increase (Decrease) in
Actuarial Cost (Savings) to: The Actuarial Present Value
All Louisiana Public Retirement Systems $97,481,233
Other Post Retirement Benefits $0
Total $97,481,233
This bill complies with the Louisiana Constitution which requires unfunded liabilities created by an improvement in benefits to be
amortized over a period not to exceed ten years.
Estimated Fiscal Impact:
The chart below shows the estimated fiscal impact of the proposed legislation. This represents the effect on cash flows for
government entities including the retirement systems and the Office of Group Benefits. Fiscal costs include estimated administrative
costs and costs associated with other fiscal concerns. A fiscal cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. F iscal savings are
denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number.
EXPENDITURES 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-2018 2018-2019 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated See Below See Below See Below See Below See Below See Below
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total See Below See Below See Below See Below See Below See Below
REVENUES 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-2018 2018-2019 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
2014 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE H B 85
Page 2 of 3
Bill Information:
Current Law
Article 10(29)(F), enacted by the legislature and the voters in 2010, states “Benefit provisions for members of any public
retirement system, plan, or fund that is subject to legislative authority shall be altered only by legislative enactment. No such
benefit provisions having an actuarial cost shall be enacted unless approved by two-thirds of the elected members of each house
of the legislature.” Based on our reading of the amendment, our discussions with General Counsel for the LLA, and our
discussions with legislative staff, we have concluded for the purposes of this actuarial note, that future transfers of investment
gains to the Experience Account will occur until the balance in the Experience Account is equal to the cost of a 6% benefit
increase for eligible retirees. However, because future COLA grants will require the introduction of a bill, approval by two-thirds
of the House and Senate, and the signature of the governor, we assume that COLA grants are ad hoc, and are not automatic.
Current law provides a legal template that the legislature may choose to adopt in the enactment of permanent benefit increases
(PBI). This template specifies eligibility criteria, which is generally age 60 with one year of retirement, and the basis for the
amount of a PBI grant , which is the CPI-U. There is no requirement that PBI legislation follow the template. Nor is there any
guarantee that PBIs in the future will even be based on the balance in the Experience Account.
The PBI template provides the following:
Eligibility:
The following retirees and beneficiaries of the Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System (LASERS) will be eligible for
a PBI.
1. Each retiree who satisfies all of the following criteria on June 30, 2014:
• Has received a benefit for at least one year, and
• Has attained at least age 60.
2. Each non-retiree beneficiary (including each survivor of a deceased active member) receiving a benefit on June 30,
2014, who satisfies all of the following criteria:
• The deceased member or beneficiary or both combined have received benefits for at least one year, and
• The deceased member would have been at least age 60 had he lived.
3. Each disability retiree and each beneficiary who is receiving benefits based on the death of a disability retiree, who
also on June 30, 2014, has been receiving benefits for at least one year.
Permanent Benefit Increase
• Based on the template law, each eligible retiree and beneficiary will be eligible for a 1.5% PBI on the portion of a
retiree/beneficiary’s benefit that is less than $96,931.
Proposed Law
HB 30 provides a permanent benefit increase equal to 1.5% x the individual’s current annual benefit for eligible retirees. The
permanent benefit increase will be based on the first $96,931 of the benefit currently payable. In other words, the maximum
permanent benefit increase that may be granted is $1,453.97 per year.
The benefit increase provided by HB 85 shall become effective July 1, 2014.
Implications of the Proposed Changes
As a result of HB 85, amounts in the LASERS Experience Account will be used to provide permanent benefit increases for
eligible retirees and beneficiaries. The maximum benefit increase will be the lesser of 1.5% x the current annual benefit and
$1,453.97.
Cost Analysis:
Analysis of Actuarial Costs
Retirement Systems
The actuarial present value of future benefits of LASERS will increase $ 97,481,233 if HB 85 is enacted. Additional
information is shown below:
Eligible Members Number Increase in Accrued Liability
Retirees age 60 and older with one year of retirement 28,722 $ 84,301,094
Beneficiaries and Survivors 5,515 9,230,820
Disability Retirees 2,459 3,949,319
Total 36,696 $ 97,481,233
2014 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE H B 85
Page 3 of 3
If HB 85 is enacted, $97,481,233 will be transferred from the Experience Account to the Regular Benefit Account to offset
the additional liability incurred by the retirement system. Employer contribution requirements will not change.
Other Post Retirement Benefits
There are no actuarial costs associated with HB 85 for post-employment benefits other than pensions.
Analysis of Fiscal Costs
HB 85 will have the following effect on fiscal costs during the five year measurement period.
Expenditures:
1. Expenditures from the General Fund will not change.
2. Expenditures from LASERS (Agy Self- Generated) will increase beginning FYE 2015 as larger pension benefits are
distributed. There will be an outflow of funds from the System for the PBI payments to eligible retirees and
beneficiaries in the following amounts by year.
Fiscal Year
Increase in
LASERS Expenditures
2014-15 $ 10,601,673
2015-16 10,322,302
2016-17 10,030,001
2017-18 9,729,766
2018-19 9,419,382
Total $ 50,103,124
3. Expenditures from Local Funds will not change.
Revenues:
• LASERS revenues (Agy Self-Generated) will not change. Assets in the Experience Account will be transferred to the
Regular Benefit Account to cover the additional liability associated with the enactment of HB 85.
Actuarial Data, Methods, and Assumptions
This actuarial note was prepared using actuarial data, methods, and assumptions as disclosed in the most recent actuarial valuation
report approved by PRSAC. These assumptions and methods are in compliance with actuarial standards of practice. This data,
methods and assumptions are being used to provide consistency with the actuary for the retirement system who may also be
providing testimony to the Senate and House retirement committees.
Actuarial Caveat
There is nothing in HB 85 that will compromise the signing actuary’s ability to present an unbiased statement of actuarial opinion.
Actuarial Credentials:
Paul T. Richmond is the Manager of Actuarial Services for the Louisiana Legislative Auditor. He is an Enrolled Actuary, a
member of the American Academy of Actuaries, a member of the Society of Actuaries and has met the Qualification Standards of
the American Academy of Actuaries necessary to render the actuarial opinion contained herein.
Dual Referral:
Senate House
x 13.5.1: Annual Fiscal Cost ≥ $100,000 6.8(F)(1): Annual State Fiscal Cost ≥ $100,000
13.5.2: Annual Tax or Fee Change ≥ $500,000 6.8(F)(2): Annual State Revenue Reduction ≥ $500,000
6.8(G): Annual Tax or Fee Change ≥ $500,000