Provides for the Louisiana State Law Institute recommending repeal, removal or revision of law that has been declared unconstitutional by final and definitive court judgment. (gov sig)
Impact
The passage of SB180 is positioned to have a significant impact on how laws in Louisiana are managed in relation to judicial decisions. This bill provides a structured approach for the Louisiana State Law Institute to actively participate in the legislative process, ensuring that outdated or unconstitutional provisions are systematically addressed. The implications of this law could lead to a cleaner statute book, helping lawmakers and citizens better understand existing laws and their validity, thereby fostering public trust in the legal system.
Summary
Senate Bill 180 aims to amend the procedures of the Louisiana State Law Institute by allowing it to make biennial recommendations to the legislature concerning laws that have been declared unconstitutional by final court judgments. This addition is intended to help the state legal framework remain updated and responsive to judicial findings, promoting a clearer legal system that can adapt to social needs. By including specific clauses related to the recommendations for repeal, removal, or revision of such laws, SB180 seeks to enhance the Institute's role in maintaining the integrity of state legislation.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB180 appears to be largely positive, particularly among lawmakers and legal experts who recognize the benefit of having an authoritative body proactively recommending changes to the law based on judicial findings. Supporters argue that this would enhance the legal coherence in the state. However, there may also be concerns regarding the speed and effectiveness of implementing these recommendations, as legislators must still engage in the policymaking process to act on the Institute's recommendations.
Contention
Notably, while the bill seems to receive widespread approval, as evidenced by the final passage votes with no opposition (91-0 in the House), there are potential points of contention regarding how effectively the recommendations will be acted upon. Critics may question whether the legislative body will take the Institute's suggestions seriously and how this new responsibility could affect the legislative workload. Furthermore, robust discussions may arise about the implications of expediting the removal of laws deemed unconstitutional, especially those that may still serve a function in their respective contexts despite their legal issues.
Provides that a member of the Louisiana City Court Judges Association be added to the membership of the Louisiana State Law Institute. (gov sig) (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)