Louisiana Senate Bill SB304

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14

Caption

Provides relative to the Louisiana State Law Institute and recommendations to the legislature. (gov sig)

Impact

If enacted, SB 304 will enhance the capacity of the Louisiana State Law Institute to proactively address statutory deficiencies by outlining a clear protocol for the evaluation of laws that have been invalidated by court decisions. This measure is expected to contribute to a more responsive and adaptive legal system in Louisiana, ensuring that outdated or unconstitutional laws are systematically reassessed and revised or removed as necessary.

Summary

Senate Bill 304, introduced by Senator Claitor, pertains to the operations and duties of the Louisiana State Law Institute. The bill aims to refine and clarify the responsibilities of the Institute, providing the framework for biennial recommendations to the legislature regarding the revision or repeal of laws deemed unconstitutional. This initiative underscores the necessity for ongoing legal reform and modernization within the state's legislative framework.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 304 appears to be supportive among legal scholars and reform advocates who recognize the importance of maintaining an updated code of laws that reflect contemporary legal standards and social needs. However, the potential implications of revising or repealing existing laws may raise concerns among certain interest groups who advocate for specific legal protections or provisions that could be affected by such changes.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding which laws are recommended for repeal or revision and the degree of influence various stakeholders may have in this process. The ability of the Louisiana State Law Institute to recommend changes carries significant weight in shaping the legal landscape, and any perceived bias towards certain legal interpretations or political pressures could lead to debates about the Institute's autonomy and the fairness of its recommendations.