Louisiana Senate Bill SB502

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14
• Report Pass: 3/18/14
• Engrossed: 3/25/14
• Refer: 3/26/14
• Report Pass: 5/21/14
• Enrolled: 6/1/14
• Chaptered: 6/18/14
• Passed: 6/18/14

Caption

Provides for the licensure of pain management clinics. (gov sig)

Impact

The passing of SB 502 is expected to significantly impact the operation of pain management clinics by enforcing more stringent ownership and operational requirements. Clinics established prior to June 15, 2005, must meet specific conditions, such as not being owned by individuals with certain criminal backgrounds, including felonies or misdemeanors related to narcotics. Additionally, these clinics are required to operate under the guidance of a qualified medical director and implement policies consistent with state regulations. This act aims to streamline access to pain management services while ensuring accountability within the healthcare system.

Summary

Senate Bill 502 aims to establish regulations concerning the licensure of pain management clinics in Louisiana. The bill amends R.S. 40:2198.12(D), formalizing the requirements for these clinics to operate legally within the state. This legislation ensures that clinics adhering to certain operational standards can be licensed, while also delineating criteria for ownership and operational compliance with state regulations. One notable change includes the expiration of existing licensure exemptions for clinics that do not complete the necessary applications for licensure by a specified date.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 502 is generally supportive among healthcare policymakers and regulatory bodies who view the legislation as a necessary step towards improving patient care and safety in pain management. Proponents argue that by setting clear regulations and standards for pain management clinics, the legislation will enhance the quality of care provided to patients suffering from chronic pain. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders about the potential burden on existing clinics and the implications for patient accessibility to pain management services following implementation.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 502 center around the rigorous criteria for clinic ownership and operation. Critics argue that the bill may unintentionally limit the availability of pain management services, particularly for individuals seeking care within their communities. It raises questions about how the requirements may affect smaller, independent clinics that could struggle to meet the new standards. These discussions reflect ongoing debates over striking a balance between ensuring patient safety and maintaining sufficient access to care for individuals in need of pain management.