Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB170

Introduced
3/26/15  
Introduced
3/26/15  
Refer
3/26/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
4/28/15  
Report Pass
4/28/15  
Engrossed
5/5/15  
Engrossed
5/5/15  
Refer
5/6/15  
Refer
5/6/15  
Report Pass
5/25/15  
Enrolled
5/28/15  
Enrolled
5/28/15  
Chaptered
6/19/15  
Chaptered
6/19/15  

Caption

Changes the amount of the surety bond requirement for driving schools

Impact

The amendments proposed by HB 170 would directly impact R.S. 40:1462, which governs bond requirements for private driving schools. By lowering the bond amount, the bill is expected to encourage more participation in the private driving school sector, possibly leading to increased competition and better availability of driving education services across the state. However, it retains a safety net for students; if a school fails to fulfill its obligations, claims can still be made against the bond, ensuring a level of financial security for consumers.

Summary

House Bill 170, introduced by Representative Hollis during the 2015 Regular Session, proposes a significant amendment to the existing bond requirements for private driving schools in Louisiana. The bill specifically aims to reduce the required surety bond for these institutions from $40,000 to $20,000. This change is intended to alleviate the financial burden on driving schools, making it easier for them to operate and comply with state regulations while still providing protection for students and their parents regarding the services promised.

Sentiment

Initial sentiments surrounding HB 170 appeared to be largely positive, particularly among driving school operators who viewed the reduced bond requirement as a beneficial reform. The bill received unanimous support in the Senate, suggesting that there were no significant opposition voices during the legislative process. This consensus indicates a general agreement on the necessity of revising the existing law to better reflect the operational realities of private driving schools.

Contention

While there does not appear to be substantial contention regarding HB 170 as it stands, concerns around reduced surety bonds typically revolve around the potential risks to consumer protection. Critics may argue that lowering the bond requirement might lead to less accountability for driving schools. However, the provisions within the bill that allow claims to be made against the bond serve to mitigate these risks, ensuring that the interests of students remain safeguarded despite the financial adjustments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

LA SB476

Provides relative to driving school bond requirement and cease and desist orders. (8/1/14)

LA HB923

Provides relative to requirements for private training and driving instructor schools

LA HB644

Requires nonrenewal of driving school contracts to be based upon same factors for termination of driving school contracts

LA HB350

Provides relative to the surety bond required for third-party testers administering driving skills tests for Class "A", "B", or "C" driver's licenses

LA SCR1

Amends rules of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, public safety services, relative to driving schools.

LA HCR111

Creates a task force to study the feasibility of exempting producers of sureties from certain requirements of R.S. 22:855

LA HB403

Provides for the imposition of fines for driving offenses (EN INCREASE SD RV See Note)

LA HB669

Provides relative to background checks of private training or driving instructor training schools or agencies (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

LA HB606

Increases charges and clarifies contract requirements relative to public license tag agents (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

LA SB47

Provides technical changes to current law relative to the crime of driving while intoxicated. (gov sig)

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.