Louisiana House Bill HB236

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/15
• Refer: 3/31/15
• Refer: 4/13/15

Caption

(Constitutional Amendment) Exempts items constituting business inventory from ad valorem property tax

Impact

The bill intends to provide significant relief for businesses by alleviating the tax burdens associated with holding inventory. By exempting these items from local ad valorem taxes, it aims to promote business growth and investment within the state. This shift might encourage companies to operate more efficiently and competitively, potentially leading to an uptick in economic activity and job creation. The amendment would fundamentally alter how property taxes are levied on businesses, thereby impacting state revenue streams derived from property taxes.

Summary

House Bill 236 is a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at exempting items constituting business inventory from ad valorem property taxes in Louisiana. Specifically, the bill defines business inventory to include goods held for sale, goods in production, goods for ultimate consumption in production, and items used for marketing and distribution activities. The proposed changes would be applicable for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2015, should it gain approval from the state's electorate during the election scheduled for October 24, 2015.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 236 appears generally supportive among business advocates who argue that tax relief on inventory will serve as an economic stimulus for local economies. However, there might be concerns about the implications for local government funding, as a reduction in ad valorem tax revenues could strain budgets that rely on these funds for essential services. Discussions indicate a recognition of the potential economic benefits but also caution regarding equitable funding for public services.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB 236 revolve around the long-term implications for local governance and funding sources. Opponents of the bill may raise concerns that such a tax exemption could limit the financial resources available to local governments, which traditionally rely on property taxes to support public services like education, public safety, and infrastructure. Establishing exemptions at the constitutional level may also limit future legislative flexibility in adjusting tax policies to respond to changing economic conditions.