Louisiana House Bill HB409

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/2/15
• Refer: 4/2/15
• Refer: 4/13/15

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Emile Collins v. City of Thibodaux, Lafourche Parish Government, and State of Louisiana"

Impact

The approval of this bill would directly affect the state’s budget, as it necessitates the allocation of public funds to satisfy a legal ruling. This appropriation showcases the state's commitment to upholding judicial rulings and ensuring that governmental financial obligations, which result from legal actions, are met in a timely manner. Moreover, it underscores the importance of setting aside funds for such contingencies within the state budget to avoid future financial mishaps that could arise from unpaid judgments.

Summary

House Bill 409 proposes the appropriation of $65,000 from the state general fund for the Fiscal Year 2015-2016. This amount is designated for the payment of a consent judgment in the case of 'Emile Collins v. City of Thibodaux, Lafourche Parish Government, and State of Louisiana'. The bill aims to settle a legal obligation that has emerged following a verdict or consent judgment issued by a court ruling, thereby fulfilling the state's responsibilities under the law.

Sentiment

Sentiment around HB 409 is likely neutral, primarily reflecting a common legislative practice of appropriating funds to cover legal settlements. While it might not stir intense public or political debate, it does highlight the intersection of legal and governmental responsibilities. Legislators typically support such bills as necessary actions to ensure compliance with judicial decisions, although opposition could arise if the appropriation were seen as excessive or misaligned with budget priorities.

Contention

One notable point of contention could be the prioritization of funds, especially amid competing needs within state budgets. Stakeholders may express concerns about the allocation of $65,000 for this judgment at a time when funds could possibly be directed toward other pressing state issues such as education or infrastructure. Additionally, there may be public scrutiny regarding the nature of the judgment and the actions that led to the legal dispute, which could spark discussions on accountability within local governance.