Louisiana House Bill HB551

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/15
• Refer: 4/3/15
• Refer: 4/13/15

Caption

Suspends all state sales and use tax exemptions for a certain period of time

Impact

The enactment of HB 551 would have significant implications on Louisiana's tax revenue streams and state budget. By suspending tax exemptions, businesses and consumers alike would face higher effective tax rates during the stipulated period, as previous exemptions related to various goods and services would no longer apply. This change is intended to bolster state finances, but it also raises concerns about the economic burden placed on consumers and businesses, particularly in times of economic strain.

Summary

House Bill 551 aims to suspend all state sales and use tax exemptions for the period from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2017. This legislation addresses the existing state sales and use tax framework that currently allows for certain exemptions, which are explicitly rendered inapplicable during the suspension period. Supporters of the bill advocate for the increased revenue that could be generated from the removal of these exemptions, arguing that it could offset budgetary shortfalls and fund essential state services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 551 appears to be mixed. Proponents highlight the necessity of enhanced revenue collection to support vital state operations, suggesting that the absence of exemptions would lead to a more equitable tax structure where all consumers contribute to state revenues. Conversely, opponents caution against the potential backlash from constituents facing increased costs. There is a palpable concern regarding how these changes may disproportionately affect lower-income families and businesses operating on thin margins.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 551 center around the implications for various sectors that benefit from sales tax exemptions. Critics argue that the bill may unduly impact sectors such as education, healthcare, and essential goods that traditionally rely on these exemptions to maintain affordability. The debate underscores a broader discussion on state fiscal policy, with tensions between fiscal responsibility and the need to protect public welfare through sensible taxation.