Louisiana House Bill HB586

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/15
• Refer: 4/3/15
• Refer: 4/13/15

Caption

Provides with respect to a tax on the transmission of money and a tax credit for payment of the tax

Impact

The bill’s financial provisions are designed to enhance state revenue, with proceeds allocated to the newly created Quality of Life Fund. This fund is intended to support vital community services, including health programs and state parks improvements, thereby ensuring that collected taxes are reinvested into the state's infrastructure and public health initiatives. This aspect of the bill aims to foster community welfare and support essential services utilizing revenue generated from economic activities.

Summary

House Bill 586 proposes the imposition of a tax on money transmission services within Louisiana, establishing a new tax structure compliant with regulatory measures that govern financial institutions. This bill aims to levy a tax of $5 on transactions of $500 or less and an additional 1% for amounts exceeding $500. The tax would be collected from customers at the time of the transaction and remitted quarterly to the Department of Revenue, reinforcing the state’s financial oversight of the money transmission industry.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 586 appears to be mixed, with proponents highlighting the necessity of regulating money transmission to ensure state revenue streams and community support. Supporters believe the financial oversight will help combat financial malpractice and promote accountability. However, there are concerns among certain stakeholders about the additional financial burden on consumers, particularly those who regularly engage in money transmission for personal or business purposes. The potential impact on lower-income individuals who often rely on such services could frame future debates regarding the legislation.

Contention

Key points of contention pertain to the fairness of imposing such a tax on money transfers, especially regarding the perceived impact on low-income communities who utilize these services. Critics might argue that introducing a tax could disproportionately affect those who rely on money transmission services for essential payments or transfers. Additionally, the mechanisms for tax collection and compliance could also present challenges, raising concerns about the effectiveness and transparency of enforcement measures placed upon money transmitters.