Louisiana House Bill HB764

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/15
• Refer: 4/3/15
• Refer: 4/13/15

Caption

Suspends a certain portion of state sales and use tax exemptions (OR +$177,400,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

The impact of HB 764 on state laws is significant, as it alters the existing framework for sales and use tax exemptions. By suspending these exemptions, the bill potentially allows the state to increase its revenue by an estimated $177.4 million for the specified period. This revenue could be redirected towards funding various public services and programs, although the increased tax burden on consumers and businesses may be a consideration for the legislature as they move forward.

Summary

House Bill 764, introduced by Representative Thibaut, is designed to suspend certain exemptions from the state sales and use tax for a specified period from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2017. The bill mandates that these exemptions, which include those for agricultural products, medical supplies, and purchases by nonprofit organizations, will become inapplicable during the stated timeframe. This legislative change aims to increase government revenues by broadening the tax base as it temporarily eliminates tax holidays for various categories of goods and services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 764 has been mixed. Proponents of the bill argue that suspending tax exemptions is a necessary measure to address fiscal challenges and support state budgetary needs. They highlight the importance of increasing revenue streams as a means of sustaining essential public services. Conversely, opponents raise concerns about the potential economic impact on small businesses and consumers, who may face higher prices as a result of the expanded tax responsibilities.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 764 focus on the implications for specific sectors that benefit from existing sales tax exemptions. Agricultural producers and nonprofit organizations, which are among those affected, argue that the temporary suspension of exemptions could strain their operational budgets and hinder their ability to serve their communities effectively. This debate underscores a broader discussion about balancing state revenue needs with support for critical services and sectors within the economy.