Louisiana House Bill HB827

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/22/15
• Refer: 4/27/15

Caption

Phases out corporation income tax

Impact

If enacted, HB 827 would significantly alter the tax landscape for corporations in Louisiana. The elimination of corporation income tax could appeal to both domestic and foreign businesses, making Louisiana a more competitive state for business operations. However, the fiscal implications for state revenue are also a point of contention, as tax revenues currently sourced from corporation taxes would need to be replaced by other means or risk impacting state-funded programs and services.

Summary

House Bill 827 proposes a phased elimination of the corporation income tax in Louisiana over a five-year period. The bill outlines specific reductions to the existing tax rates, starting with an 80% reduction for taxable years beginning in 2015 and ending with a complete phase-out by 2019. This legislative change aims to ease the financial burden on corporations operating within the state, thereby fostering a more favorable business environment. By removing the income tax for corporations, the bill seeks to attract and retain businesses in Louisiana, which proponents argue will stimulate economic growth and job creation.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 827 is mixed. Supporters, particularly from the business community and certain legislative factions, argue that the bill represents a necessary step toward economic revitalization. Conversely, critics voice concerns regarding potential long-term negative consequences for state finances and public service funding. The debate illustrates broader ideologies regarding tax policy, with strong arguments on both sides regarding the balance between incentivizing business development and ensuring adequate public funding.

Contention

Key points of contention include the potential short-term loss of state revenue against the proposed long-term economic benefits. Detractors assert that reliance on corporate taxation provides essential funding for state services, including education and infrastructure. Proponents counter that the benefits of attracting new investment and maintaining existing businesses will outweigh the initial revenue losses. The bill raises crucial questions about the sustainability of state funding in the context of aggressive tax policy changes.