Louisiana House Bill HB89

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/11/15
• Refer: 3/11/15
• Refer: 4/13/15

Caption

Reduces the amount of the inventory tax credit (OR +$13,000,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

The implications of HB 89 suggest a significant change in how tax credits are applied to local inventory taxes. By reducing the credit amount, the bill potentially results in increased costs for businesses reliant on these credits, which may affect their financial planning and operational budgeting. It reflects a broader attempt within the state to manage fiscal budgets while navigating the implications of tax policy on local economies and business activities.

Summary

House Bill 89 aims to amend the tax credits related to inventory taxes paid to political subdivisions in Louisiana. The bill proposes a reduction in the inventory tax credit from 100% to 75% for ad valorem taxes paid during a specified period—from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2017. This adjustment impacts manufacturers, distributors, and retailers who rely on these credits for their inventory taxes, shifting some financial burden back onto these businesses during the designated timeframe.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 89 may reflect mixed feelings among stakeholders. Proponents might argue that such a reduction is a necessary measure to align with the state's fiscal responsibilities, especially in times of budgetary constraints. Conversely, opponents likely view this as a setback for businesses that depend on the full credit to mitigate their tax liabilities, raising concerns about the potential negative effect on job retention and economic growth within the region.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 89 stem from the balance between necessary state budget reforms and the financial impacts these changes impose on local businesses. Critics may argue that reducing the credit undermines support for key industry sectors, while supporters could justify the change as a responsible fiscal measure aimed at prioritizing state funding. The discussions surrounding this bill also touch upon broader themes of tax fairness and the role of state government in mitigating local tax burdens.