Louisiana House Bill HCR215

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/2/15
• Refer: 6/3/15

Caption

Expresses the sense of the legislature concerning federal funding and programs

Impact

The impact of HCR215 lies in its assertion that any public official who unilaterally rejects substantial federal funding, which could yield over $100 million in savings for state general funds, would be deemed to have abused their office's powers. This measure indicates a movement towards accountability regarding the acceptance or rejection of federal funds, promoting a sense among legislators that efficient use of such resources is paramount for the state's welfare.

Summary

HCR215 expresses the sense of the Louisiana legislature regarding the importance of federal funding for public services in the state. The resolution emphasizes the fiscal responsibility of public officials in directing the expenditure of taxpayer resources derived from federal funding, particularly when such funds could help improve access to essential services, such as healthcare, and prevent financial crises in state institutions. It specifically points out that rejecting significant federal funding compromises the state's ability to deliver necessary services to its citizens.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR215 reflects a strong support for the acceptance of federal funds in order to safeguard the public interest and ensure that state services remain funded and operational. Legislators who support the resolution likely view it as an important reminder of the collaborative responsibility they share, while those who might oppose it could see it as an encroachment on executive authority or an undue influence on budgeting decisions.

Contention

A notable point of contention inherent within HCR215 is its mention of the lieutenant governor's powers, which would allow for the acceptance of federal funds in instances where the governor unilaterally refuses such funding. This aspect raises questions regarding the balance of power within the state government and whether this resolution could lead to significant political friction in decision-making processes around fiscal matters.