RÉSUMÉ DIGEST
Act 466 (SB 263) 2015 Regular Session Thompson
Prior law provided for the repurchase of farm, industrial, and lawn and garden equipment
by a wholesaler.
Prior law applied to written contracts or oral agreements of definite or indefinite duration
between any person, firm, or corporation engaged in the business of selling, distributing or
retailing farm, construction, heavy industrial material handling, utility and lawn and garden
equipment, engines, implements, machinery, attachments and repair parts for such
equipment and any wholesaler, manufacturer or distributor of such equipment and repair
parts, whereby the retailer agrees with the wholesaler, manufacturer or distributor to
maintain a stock of such parts, or complete equipment or machines, or attachments. Any
successor in interest of the manufacturer, wholesaler, or distributor shall include any
purchaser of assets or stock, any surviving corporation resulting from merger or liquidation,
any receiver or assignee, or any trustee of the original equipment manufacturer, wholesaler
or distributor.
New law provides that prior law shall apply to forestry contracts or agreements.
Prior law defined certain terms and phrases.
New law defines "forestry equipment" and "dealer agreement" and includes forestry
equipment dealer in the definition of "dealer".
New law provides that dealers have a choice of remedy. The remedies provided by law are
in addition and supplemental to remedies provided in any dealer agreement. A dealer may
elect to pursue its contract remedy, the remedies provided by law, or both.
New law provides that an election by the dealer to pursue remedies as provided in the dealer
agreement shall not preclude or prohibit the dealer from exercising his rights to any other
remedies provided by law.
New law provides that any provision included in an agreement between an agent and a dealer
that attempts to limit or otherwise preclude or prohibit a dealer from exercising any rights
or protections provided by law shall be null, void, and unenforceable.
Prior law provided that no agent may terminate, cancel, fail to renew, or substantially change
the competitive circumstances of a dealership agreement or contract without good cause.
New law retains prior law and adds that in addition to good cause, an agent must have failed
to act in good faith in order to terminate, cancel, fail to renew, or substantially change an
agreement or contract.
New law provides that an agent shall bear the burden of proof that it has acted in good faith
and that there was good cause for the termination or cancellation of any dealership
agreement or contract.
Prior law provided that good cause exists whenever:
(1)An individual proprietor, partner, or major shareholder of the dealership has
withdrawn.
(2)There has been a substantial reduction in interest of a substantial partner or major
stockholder.
(3)The dealer has filed or had filed against it a petition in bankruptcy that has not been
discharged within 60 days after the filing, has been sold a substantial part of the
dealer's assets related to the equipment business, or has commenced dissolution or
liquidation.
(4)The dealer has changed its principal place of business without prior approval of the
agent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. (5)The equipment dealer has substantially defaulted under chattel mortgage or other
security agreement between the dealer and the agent, or there has been a revocation
or discontinuance of a guarantee of a present or future obligation to the agent.
(6)The equipment dealer has failed to operate in the normal course of business for 14
days.
(7)The dealer has pleaded guilty to or has been convicted of a felony substantially
affecting the relationship between the dealer and the agent.
(8)The dealer has engaged in conduct which is substantially injurious or detrimental to
the dealer's customers or to the public.
(9)After receiving at least 12 months' notice from the agent of its specific and
achievable requirements for reasonable market penetration based on the agent's
contemporaneous experience in other comparable marketing areas, the dealer has
consistently failed to meet the agent's reasonable market penetration requirements.
New law provides that good cause exists whenever:
(1)An individual proprietor, partner, or major shareholder who owns more than 25% of
the dealership has withdrawn from the dealership, and a replacement individual
proprietor, partner, or major shareholder, who meets the qualifying criteria typically
applied by the agent, in approving new dealers and agrees to be bound by the terms
and conditions of the manufacturer's standard dealer agreement, has not previously
been identified or is not identified within a reasonable time frame.
(2)There has been a substantial reduction in interest of a substantial partner or major
stockholder, and such interest is not being transferred to one or more replacement
partners or major shareholders, each of who meets the qualifying criteria typically
applied by the agent in approving new dealers.
(3)The dealer has filed or had filed against it a petition in bankruptcy that has not been
discharged within 60 days after the filing, has sold a substantial part of the dealer's
assets related to the equipment business outside of the ordinary course of business,
or has commenced dissolution or liquidation.
(4)The dealer has changed its principal place of business without prior approval of the
agent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld.
(5)Except as due to force majeure, the equipment dealer has failed to operate in the
normal course of business for 14 days.
(6)The dealer has pleaded guilty to or has been convicted of a felony substantially
affecting the relationship between the dealer and the agent.
(7)The dealer has engaged in conduct which is substantially injurious or detrimental to
the dealer's customers or to the public.
(8)The dealer has substantially defaulted under chattel mortgage or other security
agreement between the dealer and the agent, or there has been a revocation or
discontinuance of a guarantee of a present or future obligation to the agent.
(9)After receiving at least 12 months' notice from the agent of its specific and
achievable requirements for reasonable market penetration based on the performance
standards that are applied uniformly to similarly situated dealers, the dealer has
consistently failed to use commercially reasonable efforts to meet the agent's
reasonable market penetration requirements and the agent can demonstrate that the
dealer's failure is a result of the dealer's sole efforts or lack of efforts in its markets
and not a result of the agent's efforts or lack of efforts in the market. However, good
cause shall not exist if in the dealer's market share penetration meets or exceeds 80%
of the agent's North American average in the 24 months immediately preceding the
agent's attempt to terminate, cancel, fail to renew, or substantially change the
competitive circumstances of a dealership agreement or contract. Prior law provided the procedure by which an agent may terminate, cancel, or fail to renew
a dealership agreement.
New law provides except as otherwise provided by law, an agent shall provide a dealer with
at least 90 days' written notice of termination, cancellation, or nonrenewal of the dealership
agreement. The notice shall state all reasons constituting good cause for the action and shall
provide that the dealer has 60 days in which to cure any claimed deficiency, specifying the
action that must be taken in order to cure the deficiency. If the deficiency is rectified within
60 days, the notice is void. Except as otherwise provided by law, the notice and the right to
cure provisions are not required if the reason for termination, cancellation, or nonrenewal
is a violation of certain provisions of law.
New law provides that notwithstanding the terms of any dealer agreement, each agent shall
indemnify and hold harmless its dealers against any judgment for damages, including but
not limited to court costs and reasonable attorney fees of the dealer, arising out of
complaints, claims or lawsuits, including but not limited to strict liability, negligence,
misrepresentation, express or implied warranty, or rescission of sale, if the judgment arises
out of an alleged defective or negligent manufacture, assembly, design, or modifications or
alterations made by dealer, who was authorized by an agent to make such modifications or
alterations, of farm equipment, construction equipment, forestry equipment, material
handling equipment, utility equipment, lawn and garden equipment, parts, attachments, or
accessories, or other functions by the agent, which are beyond the control of the dealer.
New law provides that in no event shall a dealer be liable to an agent through the terms of
any dealer agreement between them for the gross negligence or willful misconduct of any
third party.
New law provisions shall not apply to any contractual provisions in effect on the effective
date of new law but shall apply to subsequent amendments and modifications of the contract
made after such date.
Effective August 1, 2015.
(Amends R.S. 51:481(A) and (B)(1) and (3), and 482; adds R.S. 51:481(B)(5), 481.1, 483.1,
and 490.1)