Louisiana 2015 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB41 Introduced / Bill

                    SLS 15RS-223	ORIGINAL
2015 Regular Session
SENATE BILL NO. 41
BY SENATOR ALLAIN 
Prefiled pursuant to Article III, Section 2(A)(4)(b)(i) of the Constitution of Louisiana.
CONSERVATION.  Provides relative to the recovery of site restoration costs expended from
the oilfield site restoration fund.  (8/1/15)
1	AN ACT
2 To amend and reenact R.S. 30:93(A)(1) and the introductory paragraph of (A)(3), relative
3 to the Louisiana Oilfield Site Restoration Law; to provide relative to the recovery of
4 site restoration costs; to provide for certain monetary limits and their effects; and to
5 provide for related matters.
6 Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana:
7 Section 1.  R.S. 30:93(A)(1) and the introductory paragraph of (A)(3) are hereby
8 amended and reenacted to read as follows:
9 ยง93. Recovery of site restoration costs
10	A. If the assistant secretary undertakes restoration of an orphaned oilfield site
11 under this Part, the secretary shall seek to recover all costs incurred by the secretary,
12 assistant secretary, penalties, and other relief from any party who has operated or
13 held a working interest in such site, or who is required by law, rules adopted by the
14 department, or a valid order of the assistant secretary to control, clean up, close, or
15 restore the oilfield sites in accordance with the following:
16	(1) All oilfield sites for which there is no site-specific trust fund shall be
17 restored with monies provided by the fund. Except for the responsible party, the
Page 1 of 2
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions. SB NO. 41
SLS 15RS-223	ORIGINAL
1 secretary shall not be authorized to recover restoration costs from parties which
2 formerly operated or held a working interest in an orphaned oilfield site unless
3 restoration costs for a particular orphaned oilfield site including support facilities
4 exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars. Recovery of costs under this Paragraph
5 shall be from the parties in inverse chronological order from the date on which the
6 oilfield site was declared orphaned.
7	*          *          *
8	(3) If the oilfield site does not meet the provisions of R.S. 30:88(F) and
9 restoration costs exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars, recovery of costs shall
10 be from the parties in inverse chronological order from the date on which the oilfield
11 site has been declared orphaned, except that a party shall be exempt from liability for
12 restoration of an orphaned oilfield site as provided for in this Part in which said party
13 had an operating or working interest if, and only if, the party complies with all of the
14 following:
15	*          *          *
The original instrument and the following digest, which constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument, were prepared by J. W. Wiley.
DIGEST
SB 41 Original	2015 Regular Session	Allain
Present law provides recovery of site restoration costs.  Further provides that the secretary
of Department of Natural Resources is not authorized to recover restoration costs from
parties that formerly operated or held a working interest in an orphaned oilfield site unless
restoration costs for a particular orphaned oilfield site including support facilities exceed
$250,000.
Proposed law changes the restoration costs limitation from $250,000 to $50,000.
Present law provides that if the oilfield site does not meet the provisions of R.S. 30:88(F)
and restoration costs exceed $250,000, recovery of costs will be from the parties in inverse
chronological order from the date on which the oilfield site has been declared orphaned,
except that a party will be exempt from liability for restoration of an orphaned oilfield site
if the party meets certain requirements.
Proposed law changes the restoration costs limitation from $250,000 to $50,000.
Effective August 1, 2015.
(Amends R.S. 30:93(A)(1) and (A)(3)(intro para))
Page 2 of 2
Coding: Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
words in boldface type and underscored are additions.