Louisiana Senate Bill SCR3

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/1/15
• Refer: 4/1/15
• Refer: 4/13/15

Caption

Suspends from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, all exclusions, exemptions, deductions, credits, and lower rates granted against severance taxes.

Impact

If enacted, SCR3 would significantly impact the tax structure related to natural resource extraction in Louisiana. By eliminating the various financial reliefs, the state's revenue from severance taxes is expected to increase, which could help address budgetary shortfalls. The bill aims to mitigate the critical need for revenue necessary to avoid cuts to essential services that the state provides, thereby reflecting a shift in fiscal policy during challenging economic times.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 3 (SCR3) proposes to suspend all exclusions, exemptions, deductions, credits, and lower rates associated with severance taxes on natural resources for the duration of one fiscal year, specifically from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. This bill is aimed at increasing state revenue during a period of financial strain, where the legislature deems the existing tax relief measures as unsustainable. The resolution underscores the importance of maintaining vital state services, which require sufficient funding that could be generated by reinstating these taxes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to lean towards fiscal responsibility and securing the financial viability of state operations. However, there may be some concerns among stakeholders in the natural resources sector, who might view the suspension of tax benefits as a financial burden. Overall, the proponents of SCR3 advocate for the necessity of the suspension to ensure the continuation of vital state services, with an understanding that it may not be well received by all parties affected by these changes.

Contention

Notable points of contention around SCR3 revolve primarily around the potential adverse effects on the natural resource industry in Louisiana. Critics may argue that suspending tax benefits could discourage business investment and operational continuity in the sector. Additionally, there may be discussions regarding whether the resolution adequately addresses the long-term sustainability of state finances and the implications it could have on communities relying on these industries for job provision and economic activity.