Louisiana Senate Bill SCR46

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/21/15
• Passed: 4/22/15
• Engrossed: 4/22/15
• Refer: 4/27/15
• Report Pass: 5/20/15

Caption

Expresses the right of the state of Louisiana to manage its water resources.

Impact

The passage of SCR46 would affirm the state's regulatory powers concerning water management, potentially influencing existing statutes and leading to more localized decision-making standards. It emphasizes the need to prioritize state autonomy in the face of varying federal regulations that could impact regional water policies. Supporters argue that this resolution will enable Louisiana to tailor its water resource management strategies to better suit local needs, particularly given the state's unique geographical and climatic conditions.

Summary

SCR46 is a resolution that expresses the right of the state of Louisiana to manage its water resources. This bill underscores the state’s authority over the regulation and management of water within its jurisdiction, acknowledging the critical importance of effective water resource management in supporting both environmental sustainability and economic development in the region. The resolution is framed within the broader context of state sovereignty and the inherent rights of Louisiana to govern its own natural resources without undue federal interference.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR46 appears to be largely positive among its proponents, who view the resolution as a vital step toward preserving Louisiana's ability to self-govern in regard to its water resources. They emphasize the importance of state-level oversight in ensuring effective management practices that accommodate local priorities and conditions. Conversely, there may be reservations from environmental groups or federal entities regarding the state's capacity to manage these resources effectively without broader oversight, highlighting a concern over sustainability and environmental protection.

Contention

While SCR46 passes without dissent, the undercurrents of contention focus on how state management will align with environmental protection goals. Opponents may express concern that prioritizing state rights could lead to deregulation or weakened protections for wetlands and waterways. The resolution invites discussion on the balance between state authority and federal oversight in managing essential natural resources, striking at the heart of debates surrounding environmental policy and governmental responsibilities.