Louisiana Senate Bill SR68

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/28/15
• Passed: 4/29/15

Caption

Commends Louisiana State Exhibit Museum for its importance of being a depository of history, major tourist attraction, and educational center for children and adults.

Impact

The resolution highlights the museum's extensive collection that includes historical artifacts, particularly those related to Louisiana's Native American communities. By acknowledging the museum's contributions to education and tourism, the bill aims to elevate public appreciation and support for this institution, potentially influencing state policies that prioritize funding and resources for cultural and historical entities. The resolution recognizes that such institutions play a crucial role in preserving the state's heritage and promoting community engagement in the arts.

Summary

Senate Resolution 68 commends the Louisiana State Exhibit Museum for its pivotal role as a depository of history, a major tourist attraction, and an educational center for both children and adults. Established as a Works Progress Administration project in 1939, this museum not only holds architectural significance, designed by notable architect Edward F. Neild, but also showcases a variety of original artworks and exhibits that depict the rich cultural landscape of Louisiana. The museum's design and the artwork within highlight its importance as a cultural asset to the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SR68 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, with a focus on celebrating and acknowledging the integral role the Louisiana State Exhibit Museum plays in the cultural fabric of the state. It reflects a strong agreement among legislators about the importance of supporting educational and tourist attractions, fostering a sense of pride in local history. There are no noted points of contention in the discussions surrounding this resolution, indicating a unified front in support of preserving historical sites.

Contention

Although there are no direct points of contention mentioned in the resolution discussions, it may still provoke discussions on resource allocation and the importance of public funding for cultural institutions. The resolution primarily serves to recognize and praise the museum, suggesting an environment of consensus rather than dissent. Highlighting the museum’s story of resilience and its role in education can serve as a case study for similar entities when considering future legislative support.