Requests that the governor issue an executive order directing state agencies and local governments to continue to support the Louisiana State Use Program, managed by Employment Development Services.
The passage of this resolution would reinforce the existing framework provided by the LSUP, which aligns with similar programs in other states and emphasizes the importance of inclusivity in employment practices. By urging the continued support for the program, state and local governance can ensure that individuals with disabilities gain valuable marketable skills and experience, ultimately leading to greater self-sufficiency and reduced dependence on government assistance. Moreover, the continuity of job creation in this sector is anticipated to provide statewide economic benefits, keeping funds circulating within Louisiana.
Senate Resolution 73 urges Governor Bobby Jindal to issue an executive order that directs state agencies and local governments to continue supporting the Louisiana State Use Program (LSUP), which is a program that provides job opportunities to individuals with severe disabilities. Introduced by Senators White and Peacock, the resolution advocates for maintaining a legislative commitment established in 1984 to prioritize purchasing products and services from state-supported skill development centers employing persons with disabilities. This support is seen as vital for providing job training and creating more sustainable employment options for these individuals.
Overall sentiment surrounding SR73 is supportive, reflecting a commitment to social responsibility and economic integration for individuals with disabilities. The resolution emphasizes community loyalty and the performance of workers through the LSUP, indicating a positive outlook on employing disabled persons. Advocates believe this approach not only benefits the workers themselves but also contributes positively to the local economy. However, there may be divergent opinions regarding the effectiveness and funding for such programs, as discussions within the legislative framework often reveal varying priorities among different stakeholders.
While generally receiving support, the resolution may lead to debates about resource allocation among various state programs. Some may argue for the necessity of a reevaluation of how funds are used within the LSUP, especially in light of potential competing interests from other social programs or initiatives. However, as it stands, the resolution successfully underscores the importance of the government’s role in fostering employment opportunities for vulnerable populations, which can lead to potential discussions on further legislative actions to enhance program effectiveness.