Louisiana House Bill HB127

Louisiana 2016 1st Special Session

• Introduced: 3/1/16
• Refer: 3/1/16

Caption

Levies a state sales tax on certain medical marijuana production (Item #9)

Impact

The legislation is expected to have a significant impact on state laws concerning drug policy and taxation. By placing a standard sales tax on medical marijuana sales, it aligns the treatment of medical marijuana with other taxable goods, thereby normalizing its status within the state's economy. This move may also have implications for how marijuana production facilities operate, as they will now be subject to taxation based on their overall sales rather than their inventory or other taxing measures previously in place.

Summary

House Bill 127 proposes the imposition of a 4% state sales and use tax on the gross sales of licensed medical marijuana production in Louisiana. This legislative measure aims to generate additional state revenue from the growing medical marijuana industry, which has recently been expanding in the state. By replacing the current tax structure, which levies specific rates on marijuana and controlled substances, the bill streamlines the tax code for medical marijuana, making it more in line with the taxation practices of other products within the state.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 127 appears to be cautiously optimistic. Proponents of the bill, including those within the medical marijuana advocacy community, view it as a necessary step toward legitimizing and integrating medical marijuana into the state's economic framework. On the other hand, some opponents express concern over the implications of taxation and its potential burden on medical marijuana users, potentially complicating access to necessary treatments. This dichotomy suggests a complex public perception regarding the regulation of medical marijuana in Louisiana.

Contention

The points of contention primarily revolve around the balance of tax revenue generation versus the potential financial burden on patients and businesses involved with medical marijuana. Critics argue that while the bill may provide needed funds for the state, it could increase the cost of medical marijuana for patients who rely on it for therapeutic purposes. This concern reflects broader debates about the commercialization of cannabis and the implications for social equity and healthcare accessibility.