Louisiana House Bill HB38

Louisiana 2016 1st Special Session

• Introduced: 2/14/16
• Refer: 2/14/16

Caption

Increases the amount of the tax credit for contributions to educational institutions (Item #10) (OR -$275,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

By increasing the tax credit, HB 38 is expected to generate more substantial contributions to public educational institutions, potentially enhancing the resources available for students and faculty. This shift could allow schools to access better equipment and materials, supporting a more comprehensive educational experience. The bill applies to all taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2015, thus allowing taxpayers to claim these increased credits on their income tax returns for past and future contributions.

Summary

House Bill 38 aims to amend the existing tax credits for contributions made to educational institutions in Louisiana. The proposed legislation seeks to increase the allowable tax credit from 29% to 40% of the value of tangible movable property donated or sold below cost to these institutions. This change is intended to provide greater financial incentives for individuals and businesses to contribute to education-related causes, thereby promoting funding for public education and related activities such as research and training.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 38 appears to lean towards positive support, as it promotes educational funding, which is a significant concern for many stakeholders in the state. Advocates stress the importance of education in fostering economic development and improving the overall quality of life. However, there may also be concerns raised by opponents regarding the long-term fiscal implications of expanding tax credits, particularly in light of potential budgetary constraints affecting state funding.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the effectiveness of such tax credits in actually increasing educational funding versus the costs associated with providing these credits to taxpayers. Critics may argue that while the intention is to bolster education, there is a risk of reducing overall tax revenue, which could lead to funding shortfalls in other critical areas of the state's budget, necessitating a balancing of interests among competing needs.