Louisiana House Bill HB224

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/16
• Refer: 3/1/16
• Refer: 3/14/16
• Report Pass: 3/24/16
• Engrossed: 4/4/16
• Refer: 4/5/16
• Report Pass: 5/2/16
• Enrolled: 5/5/16
• Chaptered: 5/19/16
• Passed: 5/19/16

Caption

Provides with respect to court costs collected on civil filings to fund the Judicial College (EN INCREASE SG RV See Note)

Impact

The enactment of HB 224 is expected to centralize the financing for the Judicial College through the specifically allocated funds derived from these court costs. By establishing this dedicated funding, the state aims to enhance the training and resources available for judicial employees, thereby potentially improving the quality of the judicial system in Louisiana. The bill also includes stipulations for an annual audit, ensuring transparency and accountability regarding the use of the collected funds.

Summary

House Bill 224 is designed to address court costs associated with civil filings and criminal convictions in the state of Louisiana. Specifically, the bill proposes the collection of an additional fifty cents from each party liable for court costs during the initial filing of civil matters. Additionally, individuals convicted of felonies, misdemeanors, or local ordinance violations would incur a similar fifty-cent charge. The intention of these fees is to create a separate funding stream to support the operations and educational initiatives of the Judicial College.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 224 appears generally supportive, particularly among legislators who prioritize strengthening judicial education and resources. However, skepticism may arise among some groups who are concerned about the implications of additional fees on individuals already navigating the court system. The prevailing view seems to recognize the necessity of funding for the Judicial College while balancing the burden placed on litigants.

Contention

Notably, one point of contention associated with HB 224 is the increase in court costs at a time when many litigants may already be facing financial hardships. Critics might argue that adding extra fees could deter individuals from pursuing legitimate claims or punish those who are already vulnerable in the criminal justice system. Nevertheless, supporters advocate for the long-term benefits of improving judicial training, suggesting that the resultant improvements in the judiciary could enhance overall public trust in the legal system.