Louisiana 2016 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB904 Chaptered / Bill

                    2016 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE H	B 904
 
 
Page 1 of 3 
House Bill 904 HLS 16RS-302
 
Original 
 
Author: Representative Robert Billiot 
 
Date: April 11, 2016
 
 
LLA Note H B 904.01
 
 
Organizations Affected: 
Municipal Employees’ Retirement 
System 
 
OR INCREASE APV 
This Note has been prepared by the Actuarial Services Department of the Office of 
the Legislative Auditor.  The attachment of this Note to HB 904 provides 
compliance with the requirements of R.S. 24:52	1 
 
 
Bill Header:  RETIREMENT/MUNICIPAL EMP: Provides an exception to the earnings limitation applicable to a reemployed retiree 
of the Municipal Employees' Retirement System. 
 
 
Cost Summary: 
 
The estimated actuarial and fiscal impact of the proposed legislative is summarized below. Actuarial costs pertain to changes in the 
actuarial present value of future benefit payments.  A cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number.  Savings are denoted by 
“Decrease” or a negative number. 
 
Actuarial Cost to Retirement Systems  	Increase 
Total Five Year Fiscal Cost  
Expenditures 	Increase 
Revenues 	Increase 
 
 
Estimated Actuarial Impact: 
 The chart below shows the estimated change in the actuarial present value of future benefit payments, if any, attributable to the 
proposed legislation.  A cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number.  Savings are denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. 
Present value costs associated with administration or other fiscal concerns are not included in these values. 
 
 	Change in the 
Actuarial Cost to: 	Actuarial Present Value 
All Louisiana Public Retirement Systems   Increase 
Other Post Retirement Benefits 	Increase 
Total 	Increase 
 
 
Estimated Fiscal Impact: 
 The chart below shows the estimated 	fiscal impact of the proposed legislation.  This represents the effect on cash flows for the 
retirement systems and other government entities. Fiscal costs include estimated administrative costs and costs associated with other 
fiscal concerns.  A fiscal cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number.  Actuarial or fiscal savings are denoted by “Decrease” or 
a negative number.  
 
EXPENDITURES	2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-2020 2020-2021 5 Year Total
  State General Fund $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0 
  Agy Self Generated Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase 
  Stat Deds/Other                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Federal Funds                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Local Funds                          0  Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase 
  Annual Total Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase 
REVENUES	2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-2020 2020-2021 5 Year Total
  State General Fund $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0  $                       0 
  Agy Self Generated                         0  Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase 
  Stat Deds/Other                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Federal Funds                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Local Funds                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0                          0 
  Annual Total $                       0  Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase 
  
 
 
  2016 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE H	B 904
 
 
Page 2 of 3 
Bill Information: 
 
Current Law 
 
Under current law, pension benefits payable from the 	Municipal Employees’ Retirement System (MERS) are suspended if the 
sum of the retiree’s reemployment income and his pension benefit exceeds the retiree’s final average compensation as adjusted by 
the Consumer Price Index. 
 
During such reemployment, the retiree is not a contributing member of MERS.  The employer does not contribute to MERS based 
on the reemployment income.  The member does not earn any additional benefits during such reemployment. 
 
Proposed Law 
 
Under HB 904, a retiree who is a certified operator of a water supply or sewerage system will be exempt from the suspension of 
benefit rules that pertain under current law.  Such a retiree will be allowed to receive his pension in addition to his salary while 
reemployed as a certified operator of a water supply or sewerage system.  However, neither he nor his employer will contribute to 
MERS, nor will he earn any additional benefits.  Such a retiree will be allowed to collect both a salary and pension for a total 
period (not necessary contiguous) of three years.    
 
Implications of the Proposed Changes 
 
Water supply and sewerage systems contend that there is a critical shortage of certified operators.  HB 904 is intended to increase 
the supply of certified operators available for employment.  
 
Cost Analysis:  
 
Analysis of Actuarial Costs 
         
HB 904 contains benefit provisions having an actuarial cost.  Specified retirees will be able to receive benefits under HB 904 that 
they would not have been able to receive under current law.   
 
Retirement Systems 
 
HB 904 will have two effects on actuarial costs associated with MERS: 
 
1. If HB 904 is enacted, it is likely that a certified operator of a water supply or sewerage system will retire up to three 
years earlier than he would have otherwise.  The ability to receive two checks, one for employment and the other for 
pension benefits, for a period of three year is a substantial inducement to retire early. As a result, MERS will be 
paying retirement benefits for more years than it would under current law.  
 
2. As a general rule, retired certified operators are unwilling to return to work because if they do, a significant portion 
of their pension benefit will be suspended.  If HB 904 is enacted, the suspension would not occur. As a result, 
MERS will be paying benefits under HB 904 that it is not paying now under current law. 
 
Other Post-Employment Benefits  
 
HB 904 will increase the actuarial cost associated with post-employment benefits other than pension to the extent that the 
employers of certified operators provide such benefits. 
 
Analysis of Fiscal Costs 
 
 
HB 904 will have the following effects on fiscal costs during the five-year fiscal measurement period. 
 
Expenditures: 
 
1. MERS expenditures (Agy Self-Generated) will increase to the extent certified operators 	retire earlier than expected and 
receive full retirement benefits for a longer period.  
 
2. MERS expenditures (Agy Self	-Generated) will increase because retirement benefits payable to retired certified operators 
will increase.  Under current law, benefits payable to a reemployed certified operator is subject to suspension.  Under HB 
904, benefits will not be subject to suspension.  
 
3. Expenditures from Local Funds will increase to the extent that employer contribution requirements will increase to pa y 
for the additional benefits provided. 
 
Revenues: 
 
• MERS revenues (Agy Self-Generated) will increase to the extent that employer contribution requirements increase. 
 
 
Actuarial Data, Methods and Assumptions 
 
This actuarial note was prepared using actuarial data, methods, and assumptions as disclosed in the most recent actuarial valuation 
report adopted by PRSAC. These assumptions and methods are in compliance with actuarial standards of practice. This data,  2016 REGULAR SESSION 
ACTUARIAL NOTE H	B 904
 
 
Page 3 of 3 
methods and assumptions are being used to provide consistency with the actuary for the retirement system who may also be 
providing testimony to the Senate and House retirement committees. 
 
 
Actuarial Caveat 
 
There is nothing in H	B 904 that will compromise the signing actuary’s ability to present an unbiased statement of actuarial 
opinion. 
 
Actuarial Credentials: 
 
Paul T. Richmond is the Manager of Actuarial Services for the Louisiana Legislative Auditor.  He is an Enrolled Actuary, a member of the American Academy of Actuaries, a member of the Society of Actuaries and has met the Qualification Standards of 
the American Academy of Actuaries necessary to render the actuarial opinion contained herein. 
 
 
Dual Referral: 
 
Senate  	House 
 
 13.5.1: Annual Fiscal Cost ≥ $100,000 6.8(F)(1): Annual Fiscal Cost ≥ $100,000 
    
 13.5.2: Annual Tax or Fee Change ≥ $500,000  6.8(F)(2): Annual Revenue Reduction ≥ $100,000 
    
   6.8(G): Annual Tax or Fee Change ≥ $500,000