Louisiana House Bill HCR95

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/28/16
• Refer: 5/2/16

Caption

Applies to congress under U.S. Const. Art. V to call a convention of the states to propose U.S. constitutional amendments to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit federal government power, and provide for term limits for federal officials and members of congress

Impact

If adopted, HCR95 would empower the Louisiana Legislature to join a collective state effort to seek amendments to the U.S. Constitution. This initiative would potentially alter the relationship between state and federal governments, allowing for greater autonomy at the state level regarding fiscal and jurisdictional matters. The application constitutes a continuing application, meaning it remains active until at least two-thirds of the states have supported similar resolutions. This process could lead to a historical precedent for convening a constitutional convention, which has not occurred since 1787, raising questions and expectations about the potential changes to the Constitution.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution No. 95 (HCR95) proposes to apply to the U.S. Congress for the calling of a convention of the states, as authorized under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. The resolution seeks to limit the federal government’s power by proposing amendments aimed at imposing fiscal restraints, limiting the jurisdiction of the federal government, and establishing term limits for federal officials and members of Congress. This document reflects a significant move towards addressing concerns over federal overreach and seeks mechanisms for states to collectively exert their influence on federal matters.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR95 is largely positive among proponents who view it as a necessary response to perceived federal overreach. Supporters argue that establishing term limits and fiscal restraints on the federal government is crucial for preserving state rights and ensuring accountability among federal officials. However, there is an underlying tension and skepticism, especially among critics who worry about the implications of a constitutional convention, fearing it could open the door to broad changes that might undermine existing rights and protections guaranteed in the Constitution.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns over the potential outcomes of a constitutional convention, as critics argue that it could lead to unintended consequences or radical changes to the Constitution. Some fear that the amendment process could become a vehicle for political groups to push through controversial changes. Additionally, the necessity and effectiveness of fiscal restraints on the federal government are debated, with opponents citing efficiency in governance as a crucial factor. These discussions suggest a deep divide among legislators concerning the proper boundaries of federal and state authority.