Louisiana House Bill HR228

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/2/16
• Passed: 6/6/16

Caption

Expresses support for the people of Israel

Impact

The passage of HR228 reflects a statewide commitment to supporting Israel, which may influence the legislative and social climate in Louisiana regarding conversations about foreign policy and international relations. The resolution positions Louisiana as part of a broader trend among U.S. states that are taking formal stances against the BDS movement (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions), framing it as not only a political issue but also a matter of social ethics and historical friendship. This could lead to support for pro-Israel initiatives and could somewhat shift local policies to align more closely with this stance.

Summary

HR228 is a resolution expressing support for the people of Israel and their right to live freely and defend themselves. The resolution acknowledges the long-standing friendship and economic ties between the state of Louisiana and Israel. It explicitly condemns movements aimed at boycotting, divesting from, and sanctioning Israel and aims to counteract sentiments that lead to discrimination against Jewish individuals and communities. The resolution serves as a formal reaffirmation of Louisiana's solidarity with Israel in the face of international and domestic challenges.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR228 appears overwhelmingly positive among its proponents, who argue that the resolution sends a crucial message of solidarity with Israel at a time of increasing challenges. Supporters likely view it as a necessary measure to combat anti-Semitism and promote the state’s values of freedom and resilience. However, counterarguments from opponents of the BDS movement point to concerns about the implications for free speech and the diverse opinions surrounding Israeli policies, reflecting a polarizing atmosphere in the broader discourse on international solidarity versus local autonomy.

Contention

Notable points of contention include criticism from advocates of Palestinian rights who argue that resolutions like HR228 stifle criticism of Israel's policies towards Palestinians and may even hinder progress towards equitable solutions in the region. The resolution’s condemnation of the BDS movement may also raise questions about academic and economic freedom, particularly for those who advocate for change through non-violent means. Thus, while HR228 solidifies the state's position in favor of Israel, it simultaneously ignites debate about the balance between local perspectives and international relationships.