Louisiana 2016 2016 Regular Session

Louisiana Senate Bill SB18 Comm Sub / Analysis

                    RDCSB18 2992 3538
DIGEST
The digest printed below was prepared by House Legislative Services.  It constitutes no part
of the legislative instrument.  The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute
part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent.  [R.S. 1:13(B) and 24:177(E)]
SB 18 Reengrossed 2016 Regular Session	Peacock
Proposed law generally rearranges the content of present law to provide for ease of
administration and clarification of certain actuarial concepts.
Proposed law contains a few substantive changes, as further detailed in this digest.
Unless otherwise indicated, the provisions of present law and proposed law apply to all four
state retirement systems:
(1)La. State Employees' Retirement System (LASERS)
(2)Teachers' Retirement System of La. (Teachers' or TRSL)
(3)La. School Employees' Retirement System (LSERS)
(4)State Police Retirement System (Troopers)
OVERVIEW
Present law, relative to state retirement systems, generally provides for determination of
actuarial liabilities and calculations of payments to liquidate those liabilities.  Provides for
application of certain actuarial gains to help reduce the payments necessary to liquidate a
system's liabilities, to reduce specific amortization bases of system debt, and for allocation
to a side account (the experience account) designed to accumulate monies to fund benefit
increases for retirees.
Proposed law retains present law.
Present law provides for determination of the amount and timing of permanent benefit
increases (PBIs) for retirees, sometimes called cost-of-living adjustments or COLAs.
Proposed law retains present law.
SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES
Present law, subject to certain caveats, provides for a schedule of maximum PBI amounts
based on a system's funded percentage.  The schedule ranges from a minimum of 1.5% for
a system that is at least 55% funded but less than 65% funded to a maximum of 3.0% for a
system that is at least 80% funded. Provides for other changes to be triggered by the system's
funded percentage.
Proposed law retains present law.
Proposed law defines "funded percentage" for state systems. Provides that, except as
otherwise provided by law, "funded percentage" means valuation assets used to determine
contributions divided by accrued liability.
Proposed law, for purposes of determining the maximum PBI within the schedule in present
law, specifies that the funded percentage shall be determined before any allocation to the
experience account.
Present law provides that the amortization period for most actuarial changes, gains, or losses
shall be permanently reduced from 30 years to 20 years in the June 30th system valuation
Page 1 of 6 RDCSB18 2992 3538
following the fiscal year in which a system first attains a funded percentage of 85% or
greater.
Proposed law changes the trigger from 85% to 72% for LSERS and to 70% for the other
three state retirement systems.
Present law provides that, effective for the June 30, 2019 valuation, actuarial gains allocated
to the experience account shall be amortized as a loss with level payments over a ten-year
period.
Proposed law provides for this ten-year loss amortization to begin with the first system
valuation following June 30, 2015, in which an allocation is made to the system's experience
account.
Present law provides for multiple employer contribution rates at LASERS and Teachers' for
the various specialty plans within each system.
Proposed law retains present law and consolidates all K-12 employee groups at Teachers'
into a single plan for rate purposes.
Present law, relative to LASERS and Teachers', provides for special amortization bases
called the original amortization base (OAB) and the experience account amortization base
(EAAB). Provides for increasing payment schedules for these debts. Provides for application
of annual "hurdle" payments, from investment earnings above a certain target, to extinguish
these debts.
Proposed law retains present law.
Present law provides for hurdle payments on LSERS' and Troopers' oldest debts. 
Proposed law retains present law.
Present law provides that, after a hurdle payment is made, the net remaining debt to which
the payment is applied to shall not be reamortized unless the system is 85% funded.
Beginning in the 2020-2021 Fiscal Year, proposed law provides for reamortization of the net
remaining OAB liability when moving to level-dollar payments ending in 2029 results in
annual payments that are not more than the next annual payment otherwise required under
present law.
Proposed law provides that after a system first achieves a funded percentage of 80%, the
debt to which any future hurdle payment is applied shall be reamortized over the remainder
of the originally established amortization period.
Until a system is 80% funded, proposed law further provides for reamortization of the net
remaining liability after application of the hurdle payments in the 2019-2020 Fiscal Year and
in every fifth fiscal year thereafter.
Present law provides for the review of volatility of payment schedules with results reported
to the Public Retirement Systems' Actuarial Committee by Nov. 1, 2019.
Proposed law requires the review of volatility to be done following the close of Fiscal Year
2016-2017 and the report to be submitted by Nov. 1, 2017.
NONSUBSTANTIVE CHANGES
Present law provides for the following for each system:
(A)A 30-year amortization period for certain changes, gains, and losses with level-dollar
amounts.
Page 2 of 6 RDCSB18 2992 3538
(B)A switch to a 20-year amortization period after a system attains a designated funded
percentage.
(C)Application of annual "hurdle" payments, from investment earnings above a certain
target, to extinguish certain debts.
(D)Indexing of hurdle payments by increasing them as the system's assets increase.
(E) Reamortization of debts subject to the hurdle payments under certain circumstances
after a system attains a designated funded percentage.
(F)Ten-year amortization of losses due to experience account allocations.
(G)Five-year amortization of certain gains recognized in the 2014 valuation.
Proposed law retains present law.
Present law, relative to LSERS, provides for:
(H)The application of residual experience account funds on June 30, 2014, as a part of:
(I)The consolidation of existing amortization bases.
Proposed law retains present law.
Present law, relative to LASERS and Teachers', provides that:
(J)After the OAB is liquidated, the payments that had been applied to the OAB shall be
added to the hurdle payments to the EAAB.
(K)After the EAAB is liquidated, the payments that had been applied to the EAAB shall
be applied to the next oldest outstanding amortization base of debt.
Proposed law retains present law.
Present law provides for (L) a volatility review of future payment schedules for each system.
Proposed law retains present law.
Proposed law relative to the experience account at each system provides for:
(M)Credits and debits to the account.
(N)A schedule of maximum PBIs based on funded status.
(O)Payment of "partial" PBIs in certain circumstances when funds are not available for
a "full" PBI.
(P)PBIs only every other year until a threshold of funding is attained.
Proposed law retains present law.
A table of the major present law provisions that were relocated is below.
PROVISION SYSTEM	PRESENT LAW	PROPOSED LAW
A LASERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(v)(aa)(I) R.S. 11:102(C)(2)(a)
TRSL R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vii)(aa)(I) R.S. 11:102(D)(2)(a)
LSERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vi)(aa)(I) R.S. 11:102(E)(1)
TroopersR.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(viii)(aa)(I) R.S. 11:102(F)(1)
Page 3 of 6 RDCSB18 2992 3538
PROVISION SYSTEM	PRESENT LAW	PROPOSED LAW
B LASERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(v)(aa)(II) R.S. 11:102(C)(2)(b)
TRSL R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vii)(aa)(II) R.S. 11:102(D)(2)(b)
LSERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vi)(aa)(II) R.S. 11:102(E)(3)
TroopersR.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(viii)(aa)(II) R.S. 11:102(F)(2)
C LASERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(v)(bb)(I)&(II) R.S. 11:102.1
TRSL R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vii)(bb)(I) R.S. 11:102.2
LSERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vi)(bb)(I)&(II) R.S. 11:102.3
TroopersR.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(viii)(bb)(I)&(II)R.S. 11:102.4
D LASERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(v)(bb)(I)&(II) R.S. 11:102.1(A)(4)
TRSL R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vii)(bb)(I)&(II) R.S. 11:102.2(A)(4)
LSERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vi)(bb)(II) R.S. 11:102.3(A)(1)(b)
TroopersR.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(viii)(bb)(II) R.S. 11:102.4(A)(1)(b)
E LASERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(v)(bb)(I)&(II) R.S. 11:102.1(A)(4)(h)
TRSL R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vii)(bb)(I)&(II) R.S. 11:102.2(A)(4)(h)
LSERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vi)(bb)(II) R.S. 11:102.3(A)(5)
TroopersR.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(viii)(bb)(II) R.S. 11:102.4(A)(5)
F LASERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(v)(cc) R.S. 11:102(C)(2)(c)
TRSL R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vii)(cc) R.S. 11:102(D)(2)(c)
LSERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vi)(cc) R.S. 11:102(E)(4)
TroopersR.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(viii)(cc) R.S. 11:103(F)(3)
G LASERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(v)(dd) R.S. 11:102.5
TRSL R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vii)(dd) R.S. 11:102.5
LSERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vi)(dd) R.S. 11:102.5
TroopersR.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(viii)(dd) R.S. 11:102.5
H LSERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vi)(ee)(I) R.S. 11:102(E)(2)(b)
I LSERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vi)(ee)(II) R.S. 11:102(E)(2)(a)
J LASERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(v)(bb)(I) R.S.
11:102.1(A)(4)(c)(iii),
(iv)&(v)
TRSL R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vii)(bb)(II) R.S.
11:102.2(A)(4)(c)(iii),
(iv)&(v)
K LASERS R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(v)(bb)(II) R.S. 11:102.1(D)
TRSL R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(vii)(bb)(II) R.S.
11:102.2(A)(4)(e)&(D)
L all R.S. 11:102.3	R.S. 11:102.6
M LASERS R.S. 11:542(A)(2)&(B)	R.S. 11:542(B)(2)&(3)
TRSL R.S. 11:883.1(A)(2)&(B)	R.S. 11:883.1(B)(2)&(3)
LSERS R.S. 11:1145.1(A)(1)	R.S.
11:1145.1(A)(1)&(2)
TroopersR.S. 11:1332(A)(1)	R.S. 11:1332(A)(1)&(2)
Page 4 of 6 RDCSB18 2992 3538
PROVISION SYSTEM	PRESENT LAW	PROPOSED LAW
N LASERS R.S. 11:542(C)(2)	R.S. 11:542(D)
TRSL R.S. 11:883.1(C)(2)	R.S. 11:883.1(D)
LSERS R.S. 11:1145.1(C)(2)	R.S. 11:1145.1(C)
TroopersR.S. 11:1332(C)(2)	R.S. 11:1332(C)
O LASERS R.S. 11:542(G)	R.S. 11:542(D)(4)
TRSL R.S. 11:883.1(H)	R.S. 11:883.1(D)(4)
LSERS R.S. 11:1145.1(F)	R.S. 11:1145.1(C)(4)
TroopersR.S. 11:1332(G)	R.S. 11:1332(C)(4)
P LASERS R.S. 11:542(C)(2)(e)	R.S. 11:542(D)(1)(b)
TRSL R.S. 11:883.1(C)(2)(e)	R.S. 11:883.1(D)(1)(b)
LSERS R.S. 11:1145.1(C)(2)(e)	R.S. 11:1145.1(C)(1)(b)
TroopersR.S. 11:1332(C)(2)(e)	R.S. 11:1332(C)(1)(b)
Proposed law specifies that if the provisions of proposed law conflict with the provisions of
any other Act of the 2016 Regular Session, the provisions of proposed law shall supersede
and control regardless of the order of passage.
Effective June 30, 2016.
(Amends R.S. 11:102(B)(1), (2), (3)(intro para), (a), (b), (c), and (d)(intro para), (i), (ii), (iii),
and (iv), (4), and (5)(a) and (b), (C), and (D), 102.1(B)(2)(b), (3)(a)(i), (4), (5), and (6) and
(C)(2), (3)(a) and (c), (4), (5), and (6), 102.2(B)(2)(a), (3)(a)(i), (4), and (5) and (C)(2),
(3)(a) and (c), (4), (5), and (6), 102.3, 542(A), (B), (C), (E), and (F), 883.1(A), (B), (C), (E),
and (F), 927(B)(2)(a)(intro para) and (i) and (b)(i) and (3)(a), 1145.1(A), (B), (C), (D), and
(E), and 1332(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), and (F); adds R.S. 11:23, 102(E) and (F), 102.1(A)(4),
(B)(3)(a)(iv), and (D), 102.2(A)(4), (B)(3)(a)(iv), and (D), 102.4, 102.5, 102.6, 542(D), and
883.1(D); repeals R.S. 11:102(B)(3)(d)(v), (vi), (vii), and (viii), 542(G), 883.1(G) and (H),
1145.1(F), and 1332(G))
Summary of Amendments Adopted by Senate
Committee Amendments Proposed by Senate Committee on Retirement to the
original bill
1. Defines "funded percentage."
2. Provides that when LASERS, TRSL, and Troopers are 70% funded the
amortization period for most actuarial changes, gains, and losses shall be
reduced from 30 years to 20 years. Further provides that when LSERS is
72% funded the amortization period for most actuarial changes, gains, and
losses shall be reduced from 30 years to 20 years.
3. Until a system is 80% funded, provides for reamortization after application
of the hurdle payments in the 2019-2020 Fiscal Year and in every fifth fiscal
year thereafter.
4. Beginning with the 2020-2021 Fiscal Year, provides for reamortization of the
OAB payments when moving to level-dollar payments results in annual
payments ending in 2029 that are not more than the next annual payment
otherwise required under present law.
5. Removes prescribed order in which credits and debits are to be made to the
experience account.
Page 5 of 6 RDCSB18 2992 3538
6. Makes technical changes.
Summary of Amendments Adopted by Senate
Senate Floor Amendments to engrossed bill
1. Makes technical changes.
Summary of Amendments Adopted by House
The Committee Amendments Proposed by House Committee on Retirement to the
reengrossed bill:
1. Relative to present law providing for a supplemental permanent benefit increase
for state police retirees, limit the availability of such increase to those who
retired on or before June 30, 2001.
Page 6 of 6