Louisiana Senate Bill SB295

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/4/16
• Refer: 3/14/16
• Report Pass: 3/29/16
• Engrossed: 4/6/16
• Refer: 4/7/16
• Report Pass: 5/11/16
• Enrolled: 5/31/16
• Chaptered: 6/13/16
• Passed: 6/13/16

Caption

Provides relative to non-gaming economic development by the casino operator. (8/1/16)

Impact

The bill mandates that casino operators report on the personnel levels associated with both gaming and non-gaming activities quarterly to ensure accountability and transparency in employment practices. By establishing a framework for collaboration with third-party tenants, this legislation encourages casinos to take an active role in regional economic development, thus potentially revitalizing neighborhoods around casino locations. The credit system for reported employment positions should incentivize casino operators to maintain or increase their workforce and that of their tenants.

Summary

Senate Bill 295 aims to enhance non-gaming economic development opportunities associated with casino gaming operations in Louisiana. It allows casino operators to promote the establishment of businesses such as restaurants, entertainment venues, and retail outlets in close proximity to gaming establishments. This initiative is intended to stimulate local economies, create jobs, and invigorate surrounding areas around casinos, helping to diversify the economic impact of casino establishments beyond gaming activities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 295 is generally positive among supporters, primarily within the business community and those advocating for economic growth. Proponents view this legislation as a beneficial way to leverage the casino industry for broader economic gains. However, there may also be concerns regarding the saturation of the local economy with non-gaming businesses, and whether these developments adequately serve the community's needs or merely extend the interests of casino owners.

Contention

While the bill enjoys support, potential contention may arise regarding the priority given to casino operators in local economic planning. Critics might argue that the focus on revitalization via casinos could detract from other community-focused economic strategies. Additionally, the implementation of the reporting requirements could challenge operational efficiencies for smaller casino businesses that may not have the resources to comply with extensive regulatory reporting.