Louisiana Senate Bill SB73

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/16
• Refer: 3/1/16
• Refer: 3/14/16
• Report Pass: 4/5/16
• Engrossed: 4/7/16
• Refer: 4/11/16
• Report Pass: 5/4/16
• Enrolled: 5/19/16
• Chaptered: 5/27/16
• Passed: 5/27/16

Caption

Provides for the crime of resisting an officer when one knowingly interferes with a police cordon. (8/1/16)

Impact

This bill significantly amends existing laws related to public order and police operations. By expressly defining the act of knowing interference with a police cordon and authorizing law enforcement to intervene against UAS that may threaten safety, SB73 reinforces the authority of police during emergencies. This change is expected to minimize disruptions caused by unauthorized individuals who could interfere with law enforcement activities, potentially impacting the legal landscape surrounding the enforcement of public safety measures at crime scenes.

Summary

Senate Bill 73 creates a new provision under the crime of resisting an officer in Louisiana law, specifically targeting the knowing interference with police cordons. The bill defines this interference as the intentional crossing or traversing of an established police cordon by unauthorized individuals, which includes not only physical barriers but also acknowledges the involvement of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). This legislative change aims to strengthen law enforcement capabilities in managing scenes of crime or investigations, thereby enhancing public safety during critical situations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB73 appears to be largely supportive among legislators, as reflected in the unanimous vote during the bill's passage (36 yeas and 0 nays). Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step to bolster police authority and improve public safety at crime scenes. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding the balance of power between law enforcement and individual rights, particularly related to the intrusion of police cordons.

Contention

Despite its favorable reception, there are points of contention that may arise from this bill. Critics of expanding police powers often raise concerns about potential overreach and civil liberties implications. The inclusion of UAS in this legislation could also spark debate regarding privacy rights and the regulation of drone use in public spaces. Balancing law enforcement's need for effective operational control with the necessity to protect citizen rights will likely be a nuanced discussion as the implications of this law fully unfold.