Louisiana Senate Bill SCR102

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/9/16
• Refer: 5/10/16
• Report Pass: 5/24/16
• Passed: 5/25/16
• Engrossed: 5/25/16

Caption

Requests the Department of Environmental Quality to study including above ground bulk storage facilities in the Motor Fuels Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund.

Impact

The resolution aims to ensure that cleanup costs associated with environmental releases from above ground storage tanks are eligible for funding under the existing trust fund. This initiative seeks to facilitate better environmental protection measures across both types of storage systems. By expanding the reach of the fund, the state intends to enhance its capability to respond to pollutants, thereby promoting public health and environmental safety.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 102 (SCR102) calls for the Department of Environmental Quality to explore the feasibility of integrating above ground bulk storage facilities into the Motor Fuels Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund. The resolution recognizes the successful history of the fund in mitigating environmental contamination from underground storage tanks and suggests that similar protections should extend to above ground facilities that are crucial in the distribution of motor fuels.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR102 appears to be supportive, as it reflects a proactive approach to environmental stewardship. Stakeholders, including representatives from the Louisiana Oil Marketers and Convenience Store Association, are included in the discussions, indicating a cooperative effort to address potential environmental issues. There is an overall acknowledgment that allowing for comprehensive funding for cleanup could benefit communities and the environment alike.

Contention

One notable point of contention that may arise concerns the financial implications of expanding the trust fund’s coverage. Stakeholders may debate how the broadened scope could affect the fund's resources, management, and operational efficiencies. Additionally, there may be differing opinions on the extent of participation from industry representatives versus environmental advocacy groups in the study's formulation, highlighting the balancing act between economic interests and environmental responsibilities.