Louisiana Senate Bill SCR48

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/6/16
• Refer: 4/7/16
• Report Pass: 5/4/16
• Passed: 5/5/16
• Engrossed: 5/5/16
• Refer: 5/9/16
• Report Pass: 5/18/16

Caption

Requests steps be taken to preserve the State Capitol Building.

Impact

The resolution serves to raise awareness regarding the state of the Capitol Building, which is not only a functioning government space but also a National Historic Landmark open to the public. The bill draws attention to minor issues like water leaks that could lead to further complications and necessitate maintenance. Preserving the Capitol is positioned as crucial for ensuring continued public access and the long-term functionality of this governmental hub.

Summary

SCR48 is a resolution introduced to urge and request specific state leaders, including the governor, the speaker of the House of Representatives, and the president of the Senate, to take appropriate steps for the preservation of the State Capitol Building in Louisiana. The resolution highlights the importance and history of the Capitol, dedicated in 1932, emphasizing its role as a significant architectural and cultural landmark within the state.

Sentiment

Support for SCR48 appears strong, reflecting a collective appreciation for the State Capitol as a symbol of civic pride and governance in Louisiana. The resolution suggests a proactive approach by the state legislature in addressing maintenance issues, signaling a commitment to state heritage and public safety. This positive sentiment is underscored by the recognition of the Capitol's popularity, noting its appearances in media and public tours.

Contention

While SCR48 itself does not propose specific funding or detailed action plans, the call for preservation may spark discussions regarding budget allocations and resource prioritization within the legislature. Addressing the physical upkeep of the Capitol could lead to a wider examination of state building management responsibilities, potentially bringing forward debates around historical preservation versus contemporary needs in state infrastructure.