Requests the Department of Children and Family Services to study penalties for failure to pay child support.
The bill could significantly change how courts handle cases of child support non-payment in Louisiana. Currently, individuals found in contempt are subject to imprisonment or fines; however, this resolution suggests a shift towards community service as a possible alternative, which could alleviate overcrowded jails and provide a constructive remedy. If enacted, the study by the DCFS may lead to recommendations that could establish a framework for judges to impose community service as a penal alternative.
Senate Resolution 165, sponsored by Senator Mills, urges the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) to study the potential for allowing defendants found in contempt of court due to unpaid child support to perform community service in place of jail time. Specifically, this community service would focus on litter abatement and collection, addressing two issues: punishment for non-payment of child support and the need for cleaner public spaces. The resolution asks the DCFS to submit a report with findings and recommendations by February 1, 2017.
The sentiment around SR165 is generally supportive, with recognition of the dual benefit of addressing child support enforcement and litter issues in the state. Supporters advocate for innovative approaches to managing non-compliance with child support orders, emphasizing rehabilitation over punitive measures. The discussion may also highlight the importance of community service in fostering responsibility among non-payers and contributing positively to public spaces.
Notable points of contention could arise regarding the appropriateness of community service as a substitute for prison time, which could be seen as undermining the seriousness of child support obligations. Critics might argue that community service could lead to leniency for those failing to meet their financial responsibilities, potentially impacting the children who rely on those support payments. Additionally, considerations surrounding the feasibility and efficacy of managing such community services could present logistical challenges for the DCFS and the court system.