Louisiana House Bill HB220

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/17
• Refer: 3/29/17
• Refer: 4/10/17

Caption

Reduces the state sales and use tax rate and provides for the base of the remaining state sales and use tax (OR DECREASE GF RV See Note)

Impact

The implementation of HB 220 is projected to have a considerable impact on Louisiana's fiscal landscape. By reducing the sales tax rate, the state anticipates a potential decrease in overall tax revenue. This reduction could necessitate adjustments in the funding allocated to various public services, specifically those traditionally supported by sales tax revenue, such as tourism and local government funding. The bill also seeks to make the existing suspension of certain tax exemptions and exclusions permanent, which may affect a variety of sectors previously eligible for tax relief.

Summary

House Bill 220, introduced by Representative Magee, aims to reduce the state sales and use tax rate by repealing 3% of the existing combined 5% tax rate. The legislation also seeks to define the framework for the remaining 2% tax, including the handling of exemptions and exclusions related to sales of tangible personal property and services. If enacted, the changes would take effect on July 1, 2017, marking a significant adjustment in the state's tax policy aimed at alleviating the financial burden on consumers and businesses alike.

Sentiment

Sentiment around HB 220 appears mixed. Proponents argue that lowering the sales tax will benefit consumers and stimulate economic growth by putting more money back into the pockets of residents. They emphasize the importance of simplifying the tax code and making it more accessible for residents. Conversely, opponents express concern that the tax reduction will exacerbate funding shortages for essential public services, fearing that the benefits of tax savings will not outweigh the potential downsides of reduced state revenue.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions surrounding HB 220 involve the balance between tax relief for residents and the responsibilities of the state in providing essential services. Critics worry that reducing the sales tax rate without a thorough examination of the long-term revenue implications could lead to budget shortfalls, especially for local governments that rely on sales tax funds. Additionally, debates have surfaced regarding the fairness of the tax policy changes, particularly how they may disproportionately affect lower-income families who spend a larger share of their income on taxable goods and services.