Louisiana House Bill HB331

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/30/17
• Refer: 3/30/17
• Refer: 4/10/17

Caption

Terminates the solar energy systems tax credit and provides for the payment of tax credit claims for purchased systems (OR -$15,700,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

The implications of this bill are vast, particularly for the state’s efforts to promote renewable energy. By eliminating the tax credits, it could disincentivize residents from adopting solar energy, which may lead to decreased solar installations across the state. Critics argue that this will not only affect individual homeowners but could also stifle the growth of the solar energy industry in Louisiana, which may have long-term repercussions for the state's energy efficiency goals and environmental health.

Summary

House Bill 331 aims to terminate the state income tax credit for solar energy systems, both for purchased and leased systems, effective June 30, 2017. The bill proposes to no longer provide tax credits for systems installed after this date, thereby significantly limiting the financial incentives for homeowners and businesses to invest in solar energy. Previously, the tax credit structure allowed for varying benefits based on when the system was installed, with a cap on tax credits in certain fiscal years, creating a landscape of uncertainty for potential solar investors in Louisiana.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 331 appears to be polarized. Supporters of the bill, predominantly those focused on reducing fiscal expenditure, argue that the ending of tax credits is a necessary step towards a more balanced budget and fiscal health. However, opponents of the legislation contend that the reduction or elimination of incentives for solar energy directly undermines the state's commitment to renewable energy and addresses climate change issues. This divide underscores a critical discussion regarding state investment in sustainable practices.

Contention

One notable point of contention arises from the timing of the termination of tax credits, which some stakeholders view as abrupt and detrimental to prospective solar investors who had been planning installations based on existing incentives. Additionally, the bill removes previously existing caps on credits claimed for eligible systems, which could lead to a chaotic outcome as claimants may rush to utilize the tax benefits before the cap is reinstated. This move has raised concerns about fairness and the potential for inconsistent tax policy direction within the state.