Louisiana House Bill HB38

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/24/17
• Refer: 2/24/17
• Refer: 4/10/17
• Report Pass: 4/27/17
• Engrossed: 5/8/17
• Refer: 5/9/17
• Report Pass: 5/15/17
• Enrolled: 5/24/17
• Chaptered: 6/3/17
• Passed: 6/3/17

Caption

Provides relative to the authority of the board of trustees of the District Attorneys' Retirement System (EN NO IMPACT APV)

Impact

The repeal of these provisions may have significant implications for how the District Attorneys' Retirement System manages its financial resources. By eliminating specific procedural requirements, the bill allows for greater flexibility in adjusting contribution rates and directing funds, which could enhance the overall financial health of the retirement system. Furthermore, this may influence the financial planning and stability for those involved in the district attorneys' offices who depend on the retirement system for their future benefits.

Summary

House Bill 38 aims to repeal certain provisions relating to the authority of the board of trustees of the District Attorneys' Retirement System in Louisiana. Specifically, the bill focuses on removing procedural requirements concerning the setting of employer contribution rates and the directions for how funds in the funding deposit account can be utilized. This legislative change seeks to streamline the operational procedures of the retirement system, potentially making it more efficient and responsive to the needs of district attorneys.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 38 appears largely supportive within legislative discussions, particularly among those who advocate for bureaucratic efficiency and the optimization of state resources. Supporters may argue that the bill facilitates a more responsive governance model, while critics might express concerns over the lack of oversight and the potential negative consequences of removing established procedural safeguards.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the balance between efficiency and accountability. Critics may worry that repealing these provisions could lead to mismanagement or hasty decisions regarding financial contributions and the utilization of retirement funds. This tension highlights the ongoing debate about the appropriate level of oversight in state-run financial systems, particularly when it comes to retirement benefits for public servants.