Louisiana House Bill HB392

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/17
• Refer: 3/31/17
• Refer: 4/10/17
• Report Pass: 4/26/17
• Engrossed: 5/8/17
• Refer: 5/9/17
• Report Pass: 5/17/17
• Enrolled: 5/24/17
• Chaptered: 6/3/17
• Passed: 6/3/17

Caption

Prohibits insurers from combining a higher classified public fire protection area with a lower classified public fire protection area for the purpose of determining insurance rates for both districts

Impact

By enacting HB 392, Louisiana seeks to promote fairness and transparency in the fire insurance market. It ensures that residents in higher-rated fire protection areas are not penalized with increased rates due to the inclusion of lower-rated areas within the same insurance assessment. This measure could lead to reduced premiums for homeowners in well-protected communities, potentially encouraging better fire protection investments and practices across the state.

Summary

House Bill 392 aims to modify how fire insurance rates are determined for different public fire protection areas in Louisiana. Specifically, it prohibits insurance companies from combining a higher classified public fire protection area with a lower classified area when calculating insurance rates. This legislation is intended to ensure that the risk assessments and subsequent rates reflect the actual level of fire protection available in each area, rather than diluting the higher standards of better-protected districts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 392 appears to be largely positive, with strong support from legislators who understand the importance of equitable insurance practices. The unanimous vote in the Senate for its final passage indicates a broad consensus on the necessity of this bill among lawmakers. Advocates for public safety and fair insurance practices likely view this bill as a step in the right direction toward protecting consumers and ensuring accountability within the insurance industry.

Contention

While HB 392 has received overwhelming support, there may be concerns from some insurance providers regarding the implications of stricter rate determinations on their profit margins and risk assessments. However, without apparent opposition reflected in recorded discussions or votes, it seems that the bill has successfully aligned the interests of public safety advocates and policymakers. If enacted, this law would bring significant changes to the regulatory framework governing insurance calculations, reinforcing the principle that insurance rates should reflect the true risk associated with fire protection services.