Louisiana House Bill HB599

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/31/17
• Refer: 3/31/17
• Refer: 4/10/17

Caption

Imposes a per night fee on certain hotel stays

Impact

The implementation of HB 599 is expected to have significant implications for both the hospitality industry and state financial health. By establishing a dedicated fee on nightly stays, the legislation seeks to enhance tourism funding and provide a consistent revenue stream for state transportation projects. This aligns with broader economic strategies aimed at improving infrastructure while potentially enhancing the travel experience for guests. The bill’s integration of hospitality revenue into state finance reflects a legislative trend of leveraging local industries to support public services.

Summary

House Bill 599 imposes a $5 nightly fee on hotel occupancy in Louisiana, effective July 1, 2017. This legislation targets hotels, requiring them to collect this fee from guests for each night they stay, with the exception of extended stays, which are defined as accommodations exceeding thirty consecutive days. The revenues generated from this fee are earmarked for specific allocations, with 20% directed to the Office of the Lieutenant Governor for tourism purposes and 80% allocated to the Transportation Trust Fund, thereby intertwining hotel fees with state funding for transportation improvements.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 599 appears to be primarily positive among proponents, who argue that the bill will bolster tourism and create necessary funding for transportation endeavors. There is an emphasis on the necessity of leveraging tourism for state development. However, there may be concerns from hotel owners regarding the potential impact on pricing strategies and competitiveness within the broader market, particularly in a state reliant on tourism as a significant economic driver.

Contention

While the bill seems to support administrative revenue opportunities, it may also face contention from hotel stakeholders who could argue against the imposition of additional fees. The potential for increases in customer costs might spark discussion on the balance between funding state projects and maintaining manageable lodging prices. This controversy reflects the ongoing debate about how best to fund public services without unduly burdening businesses that contribute to the state’s economy.