Louisiana House Bill HB9

Louisiana 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/3/17
• Refer: 2/3/17
• Refer: 4/10/17
• Report Pass: 4/27/17
• Engrossed: 5/9/17
• Refer: 5/10/17
• Report Pass: 5/15/17
• Enrolled: 5/24/17
• Chaptered: 6/3/17
• Passed: 6/3/17

Caption

Provides relative to earnable compensation in the Firefighters' Retirement System (EN NO IMPACT APV)

Impact

The amendment to the retirement system could have significant implications for both current and future firefighters. By clearly defining earnable compensation, the bill seeks to ensure that all related compensatory elements are considered in employment benefits calculations. This could lead to a more straightforward assessment of retirement benefits, potentially enhancing financial security for retiring firefighters. Such adjustments might also influence recruitment and retention efforts within the firefighting community by bolstering the attractiveness of the retirement package.

Summary

House Bill 9 aims to amend the definitions surrounding the calculation of contributions and benefits within the Firefighters' Retirement System in Louisiana. The bill specifically focuses on the definition of 'earnable compensation,' clarifying what constitutes regular pay for firefighters, including different types of compensation such as educational incentives and holiday pay, while explicitly excluding overtime. This revision intends to provide firefighters with a clearer framework regarding their benefits as part of the state's retirement system.

Sentiment

The sentiment toward HB 9 appeared largely positive among legislators, especially those representing public service workers. Supporters expressed that clarity in compensation definitions would benefit firefighters financially and provide a more dependable estimate of retirement benefits. This perspective reflects an overall support for improving conditions for those in public safety roles, indicating a willingness among lawmakers to enhance the stability of retirement for these essential services.

Contention

While there was no major opposition noted in the available discussions or voting history, the bill did spark some debate around the complexities of defining compensatory elements and their impacts on the retirement benefits of firefighters. Lawmakers discussed the balance between adequately recognizing the contributions of firefighters and maintaining sustainable financial practices within the state’s retirement system. Such considerations highlight ongoing discussions regarding public employee benefits and state expenditures.