The original instrument was prepared by Jerry G. Jones. The following digest, which
does not constitute a part of the legislative instrument, was prepared by Xavier
Alexander.
DIGEST
SB 92 Engrossed 2017 Regular Session Tarver
Present law relative to suits between spouses provides that spouses may not sue each other except
for causes of action pertaining to contracts or arising out of the provisions of Book III, Title VI of
the Civil Code; for restitution of separate property; for divorce or declaration of nullity of the
marriage; and for causes of action pertaining to spousal support or the support or custody of a child
while the spouses are living separate and apart.
Proposed law retains present law and adds that such interspousal immunity shall not be construed
to abrogate or modify any cause of action that one spouse might have against the other. The effect
is to bar the right of action that one spouse has against the other, and prescription is suspended as
between spouses during the marriage. A judgment of divorce places former spouses in the same
situation with respect to each other, and any cause of action by one against the other, as if no
marriage had ever been contracted between them.
Present law provides that failure to bring an action for divorce pursuant to Civil Code Article 103(4)
or (5) or final spousal support pursuant to Article 112(B) shall in no way affect the rights of the party
to seek other remedies provided by law. Proposed law revises language to provide that the right of
a party to seek any other remedy provided by law shall not be affected by the failure to bring an
action for divorce pursuant to Article 103(4) or (5) or for final spousal support pursuant to Article
112(B), or by a judgment granting or dismissing an action for divorce pursuant to Article 103(4) or
(5) or for final spousal support pursuant to Article 112(B).
Present law in Civil Code Article 2315.8 provides liability for damages caused by domestic abuse,
including the award of exemplary damages upon proof that the injuries on which the action is based
were caused by a wanton and reckless disregard for the rights and safety of a family or household
member. Proposed law retains present law and extends it to dating partners. Further provides that
"domestic abuse" shall be as defined in R.S. 46:2132.
Proposed law further provides that an action for damages under above present law for an act of
domestic abuse is subject to a liberative prescription of three years. If the victim and defendant were
married at the time of occurrence of the act, this prescription commences to run from the day their
judgment of divorce becomes final and definitive. If the victim and defendant were not married at
the time of occurrence of the act, this prescription commences to run from the day the injury or
damage is sustained.
Proposed law further adds in Code of Evidence that in any civil action arising from an act of
domestic abuse as defined in R.S. 46:2132, evidence of the commission of an act of domestic abuse,
domestic abuse battery, domestic abuse aggravated assault, or sexually assaultive behavior, may be admissible and may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant subject to the
balancing test provided in Article 403. In an action for damages, a party seeking to offer evidence
shall give reasonable notice in advance of trial of the nature of such evidence. Further provides that
proposed law shall not be construed to limit the admission or consideration of any evidence
otherwise authorized by law.
Effective August 1, 2017.
(Amends R.S. 9:291 and C.C. Arts. 118 and 2315.8; adds C.C. Art. 3496.3 and C.E. Art. 412.5)
Summary of Amendments Adopted by Senate
Committee Amendments Proposed by Senate Committee on Judiciary A to the original bill
1. Changes divorce judgment to final and definitive divorce judgment.
2. Changes "offender" to "defendant."