Louisiana House Bill HB637

Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/18
• Refer: 3/2/18
• Refer: 3/12/18
• Report Pass: 4/3/18

Caption

Provides for reinstatement of driving while intoxicated hardship license by court order

Impact

The bill's impact on state laws is significant as it expands the options available to courts when dealing with DWI offenders. By allowing district courts to grant hardship licenses for the total period of suspension, individuals who rely on driving for their livelihoods may face less disruption. The intent is to strike a balance between enforcing DWI laws and acknowledging the realities of individuals' needs. This change could also result in a more compassionate approach to punishment for those who demonstrate a genuine need for continued mobility.

Summary

House Bill 637 seeks to amend the existing laws regarding the reinstatement of hardship licenses for individuals charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI). It proposes that district courts should have the authority to grant a hardship license for the entire duration of a driving suspension. This change aims to provide more flexibility for individuals who may need to retain their driving privileges for employment or essential life needs despite receiving a DWI conviction.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 637 appears to be generally positive among advocates for individuals facing DWI charges. Supporters argue that the provision for hardship licenses recognizes the necessity for certain people to maintain their driving privileges for work, family obligations, or other critical daily functions. Conversely, there could be concerns among those who advocate stricter penalties for DWI offenses, who may view this bill as a weakening of measures intended to deter such behavior.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 637 may revolve around the effectiveness of allowing courts to exercise discretion in issuing hardship licenses. Critics could argue that this discretion may lead to inconsistencies in how DWI cases are handled across the state. There could also be fears that greater leniency for offenders might undermine public safety initiatives aimed at reducing drunk driving incidents. The discussions will likely revolve around finding a balance between offender support and community safety.