Louisiana House Bill HB783

Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/2/18
• Refer: 4/3/18
• Report Pass: 4/11/18
• Engrossed: 4/19/18
• Refer: 4/23/18
• Report Pass: 5/2/18
• Refer: 5/3/18
• Report Pass: 5/8/18
• Enrolled: 5/14/18
• Chaptered: 5/17/18
• Passed: 5/17/18

Caption

Provides for the maximum amount of fees assessed on emergency ground ambulance service providers (EN +$6,146,480 SD RV See Note)

Impact

The passage of HB 783 is expected to impact state laws governing emergency medical services significantly. By establishing a maximum fee limit for ambulance services, the bill seeks to prevent overcharging that could burden individuals needing emergency care. Moreover, the legislation facilitates a collaborative approach between the Department of Health and ambulance service providers, which may foster a more supportive and efficient fee assessment process, benefiting both the providers and the communities they serve.

Summary

House Bill 783 aims to amend existing regulations concerning the fees imposed on emergency ground ambulance service providers in Louisiana. The bill specifically sets a ceiling on the fees that can be charged to these service providers while also allowing the Louisiana Department of Health to assess these fees at their discretion. This amendment is intended to ensure that the fees remain within reasonable bounds, promoting fairness and accessibility for emergency medical services in the state.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 783 appears to be positive, particularly from those advocating for equitable healthcare access. Proponents argue that regulating fees will help maintain the financial viability of emergency services without placing undue financial strain on patients who rely on these services in crisis situations. However, concerns about the bill may arise from those who fear that such regulation could limit the financial sustainability of ambulance services in a rapidly changing healthcare environment.

Contention

The repeal of certain regulatory requirements, specifically the need for the Department of Health to publish information regarding fee assessments, points to a desire for streamlined processes but may also raise concerns among stakeholders about transparency and accountability. Critics argue that not providing clear information could hinder public understanding of how fees are calculated and their implications for service availability. The balance between regulation and provider autonomy remains a critical point of discussion in the legislative evaluation of this bill.