Louisiana House Bill HCR6

Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/18
• Refer: 3/2/18
• Refer: 3/13/18
• Report Pass: 4/23/18
• Engrossed: 5/3/18
• Refer: 5/7/18
• Report Pass: 5/14/18
• Passed: 5/17/18

Caption

Provides for a hospital stabilization formula (EN +$69,495,364 SD RV See Note)

Impact

The resolution specifically targets the preservation of rural hospitals and enhances hospital funding without relying on the state general fund. By introducing a stabilization formula, HCR6 is intended to alleviate issues arising from the cost of care for uninsured residents, promoting a more sustainable approach to healthcare funding. Moreover, the assessments will determine the funding flexibility for hospitals, allowing for enhanced services while maintaining a check on the fiscal responsibility of the programs developed.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution No. 6 (HCR6) focuses on establishing a hospital stabilization formula to ensure the availability and financial viability of hospital services in Louisiana. The resolution aims to enhance inpatient and outpatient services by instituting an assessment on hospitals, with specific criteria for implementation established. This effort aligns with the Louisiana Constitution's provisions aimed at preserving healthcare availability, particularly in rural areas. The Louisiana Department of Health is tasked with calculating and collecting assessments to support this initiative.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HCR6 seems positive among legislators and stakeholders who recognize the necessity to stabilize hospital funding in light of economic pressures and healthcare reforms. However, as with many healthcare-related measures, there may be concerns regarding the implications of additional assessments for hospitals and how this could affect their bottom line, particularly for smaller or rural facilities. The bipartisan support during the legislative process suggests a recognition of the challenges faced by hospitals in the state.

Contention

While the bill does not appear to have significant points of contention, discussions may arise around the specific details of the assessment formula, particularly on how it could affect various hospital types differently. The assessment caps and the exclusion of certain facilities from these fees are crucial elements, and as such, they facilitate discussions on equitable healthcare funding and the financial strain on hospitals. It remains important for legislators to monitor the effectiveness of the stabilization formula and ensure adaptability to the changing healthcare landscape.