Louisiana House Bill HCR7

Louisiana 2018 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/18
• Refer: 3/2/18
• Refer: 3/13/18
• Report Pass: 3/26/18

Caption

Amends and repeals administrative licensing requirements relative to alternative hair and alternative hair design

Impact

The changes proposed by HCR7 could significantly alter the landscape of state laws governing cosmetology, particularly in how alternative hair designs are licensed and practiced. The repeal of strict licensing requirements aims to benefit practitioners who rely on this practice for their livelihood, offering increased freedom to operate without excessive governmental oversight. By removing the special permit requirements and prescribed curricula, the bill may allow a greater number of individuals to engage in alternative hair design, potentially leading to job creation and entrepreneurial opportunities, thus contributing to local economies.

Summary

HCR7 is a House Concurrent Resolution that amends and repeals certain administrative licensing requirements related to alternative hair and alternative hair design in Louisiana. The bill specifically amends LAC 46:XXXI.101 and 1101(A) to refine definitions and processes for obtaining permits associated with alternative hair services. It also repeals LAC 46:XXXI.1105 and 1107 which previously outlined requirements for special permits and curricula related to these services. The intended outcome is to streamline regulations and eliminate unnecessary barriers for practitioners in the field of alternative hair design, particularly styles that may be represented in diverse cultural expressions, including African head braiding.

Sentiment

Sentiments surrounding HCR7 appear to be largely supportive among practitioners of alternative hair design, as they view the bill as a means to reduce regulatory burdens that have historically restricted their ability to thrive economically. However, the bill has also sparked discussions about the need for proper regulatory measures to ensure consumer safety and professional standards. Supporters argue that the current licensing regime is overly cumbersome, especially since reports have indicated minimal health or safety risks associated with the practice, while critics might express concern over insufficient regulation in the absence of these requirements.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding HCR7 is the balance between consumer safety and economic freedom. Advocates of the bill contend that alternative hair design presents low health risks, thereby justifying the reduction of licensing requirements. In contrast, opponents may voice concerns that repealing educational requirements could lead to inadequately trained practitioners entering the field, possibly jeopardizing consumer safety. Furthermore, the implications of cultural representation in hair design practices may be considered, emphasizing the need for respectful acknowledgment of the cultural significance of certain styles while also promoting economic equity.