2019 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 27
Page 1 of 5
House Bill 27 HLS 19RS-287
Enrolle
Aut
hor: Representative Jones
Date: June 6,
LLA
No
te HB 27. 04
Organizations Affected:
Municipal Employees’ Retirement
System of Louisiana
EN I
APV
This Note has been prepared by the Actuarial Services Department of the
Legislative Auditor with assistance from either the Fiscal Notes staff of the
Legislative Auditor or staff of the Legislative Fiscal Office. The a
ttachment of this
Note provides compliance with the requirements of R.S. 24:521 as amended by
Act 353 of the 2016 Regular Session.
James J. Rizzo, ASA, MAAA
Senior Consultant & Actuary
Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company, Actuary for the Legislative Auditor
Bill Header: RETIREMENT/MUNICIPAL EMP: Provides relative to elected officials who are members of the Municipal
Employees’ Retirement System of Louisiana
Cost Summary:
The estimated net actuarial and fiscal impact of this proposed legislation on the retirement systems and their plan sponsors is
summarized below. Net actuarial costs pertain to estimated changes in the net actuarial present value of future benefit payments and
administrative expenses incurred by the retirement system. Net fiscal costs or savings pertain to changes to all cash flows over the
next five year period including retirement system cash flows, OPEB cash flows, or cash flows related to other government entities.
An increase in actuarial costs is denoted throughout the actuarial note by “Increase” or a positive number. Actuarial savings are
denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. An increase in expenditures or revenues (fiscal impact) is denoted by “Increase” or a
positive number. A decrease in expenditures or revenues is denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number.
Estimated Actuarial Impact:
The top part of the following chart shows the estimated change in the net actuarial present value of future benefit payments and
expenses, if any, attributable to the proposed legislation. The bottom part shows the effect on cash flows (i.e., contributions, benefit
payments, and administrative expenses).
Net Actuarial Costs (Liabilities) Pertaining to: Net Actuarial Cost
The Retirement Systems Increase
Other Post-employment Benefits (OPEB) 0
Total Increase
Five Year Net Fiscal Cost Pertaining to: Expenditures Revenues
The Retirement Systems Increase Increase
Other Post-employment Benefits 0 0
Other Government Entities 0 0
Total Increase Increase
Bill Information
Current Law
Under current law, if a retiree receiving a normal retirement benefit from the Municipal Employees’ Retirement System (MERS)
is rehired by an employer but he does not meet the definition of an employee , the combination of the retiree’s monthly retirement
benefit and his monthly earnings may not exceed his monthly average compensation prior to retirement. If they do, his monthly
retirement benefit is reduced as necessary so the total does not exceed his final monthly average compensation.
Current law provides that the MERS board of trustees includes three elected officials. It also provides that an elected official may continue to serve his full term on the board of trustees if he ceases to hold the elective office which qualified him for the position.
Proposed Law
HB 27 makes two unrelated changes to current law:
HB 27 makes an exception for retired members receiving normal retirement who are elected to office and satisfy the definition of
part-time elected officials. The calculation of the monthly earnings (for the purpose of limiting and reducing the retirement
benefit) shall not include income attributable to services as a part- time elected official.
HB 27 also provides that an elected official who no longer holds the elective office that qualified him to serve on the board is not
eligible to continue serving on the board.
2019 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 27
Page 2 of 5
Implications of the Proposed Changes
HB 27 will allow retired members of MERS who are elected to office, and return to work as part -time elected officials, to
continue to collect full retirement benefits along with monthly earnings, without imposing a limit on the retirement benefit due to
the combined amount. The result will be that benefits payable to such retirees may be higher than they would be under current
law.
If an elected official serves in one of the trustee positions which are meant to be held by elected officials, and that trustee no
longer holds the elective office that qualified him for the trustee position, then he is no longer eligible to serve as a trustee.
I. ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS SECTION
A. Analysis of Net Actuarial Costs
(Prepared by LLA)
This section of the actuarial note pertains to net actuarial costs or savings associated with the retirement systems and with OPEB.
1. Retirement Systems
The net actuarial cost or savings of the proposed legislation associated with the retirement systems is estimated to be a small
increase. The actuary’s analysis is summarized below.
The present value of future benefit payments may increase slightly because pension benefits for retired members of MERS
who are elected to office, and return to work on a part -time basis, will not be subject to any reduction in benefits for part-time
work. It is estimated that very few MERS retirees will be rehired as part-time elected officials with monthly earnings that
would otherwise cause a reduction in retirement benefits. Therefore, while there may be some amount of increase in future
benefits due to this proposed bill, it is estimated to be a small increase.
Not allowing elected officials to continue their terms as trustees when no longer holding the elective office qualifying them
for the position will not affect the actuarial benefit cost of the retirement system.
2. Other Post-employment Benefits (OPEB)
The net actuarial cost or savings of the proposed legislation associated with OPEB, including retiree health insurance
premiums, is estimated to be $ 0. The actuary’s analysis is summarized below.
The liability for post- retirement medical insurance protection provided to retirees by the Office of Group Benefits or other
insurers generally remains the same regardless of the amount of retirement benefits paid by MERS to a retiree.
Not allowing elected officials to continue their terms as trustees when no longer holding the elective office qualifying them
for the position will have no impact on the liability for post- retirement medical insurance protection provided to retirees.
B. Actuarial Data, Methods and Assumptions
(Prepared by LLA)
Unless indicated otherwise, the actuarial note for the proposed legislation was prepared using actuarial data, methods, and
assumptions as disclosed in the most recent actuarial valuation report adopted by the Public Retirement Systems’ Actuarial
Committee (PRSAC). The data, methods and assumptions are being used to provide consistency with the actuary for the
retirement system who may also be providing testimony to the Senate and House retirement committees. With certain exceptions,
the actuary for the LLA finds the assumptions used by the retirement systems and PRSAC to be reasonable.
C. Actuarial Caveat
(Prepared by LLA)
There is nothing in the proposed legislation that will compromise the signing actuary’s ability to present an unbiased statement of
actuarial opinion.
II. FISCAL ANALYSIS SECTION
This section of the actuarial note pertains to fiscal (annual) costs or savings associated with the retirement systems (Table A), with
OPEB (Table B), and with other fiscal costs or savings incurred by other government entities (Table C). Fiscal costs or savings in
Table A include benefit-related actuarial costs and administrative costs incurred by the retirement systems. The total effect of HB 27
on fiscal costs, fiscal savings, or cash flows is presented in Table D.
A. Estimated Fiscal Impact – Retirement Systems
(Prepared by LLA)
1. Narrative
Table A shows the estimated fiscal impact of the proposed legislation on the retirement systems and the government entities
that sponsor them. A fiscal cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. Fiscal savings are denoted by “Decrease” or
a negative number. A revenue increase is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. A revenue decrease is denoted by
“Decrease” or a negative number. 2019 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 27
Page 3 of 5
Retirement System Fiscal Cost: Table A EXPENDITURES 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
Annual Total Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
REVENUES 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated 0 Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total $ 0 Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
The proposed legislation will have the following effects on retirement related fiscal costs and revenues during the five year
measurement period.
2. Expenditures:
a. Expenditures from MERS (Agy Self-Generated) for monthly benefit payments may increase for certain retirees who are
also part-time elected officials.
b. Expenditures of participating government entities (Local Funds) will increase to the extent the employer contribution
rate increases to offset the cost of additional benefit payments.
3. Revenues:
MERS revenues (Agy Self -Generated) will increase to the extent that employer contribution rates are increased to fund the
cost of the additional benefit payments.
B. Estimated Fiscal Impact – OPEB
(Prepared by LLA)
1. Narrative
Table B shows the estimated fiscal impact of the p roposed legislation on actuarial benefit and administrative costs or savings
associated with OPEB and the government entities that sponsor these benefit programs. A fiscal cost is denoted by
“Increase” or a positive number. Fiscal savings are denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. A revenue increase is
denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. A revenue decrease is denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number.
OPEB Fiscal Cost: Table B
EXPENDITURES 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
REVENUES 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
The proposed legislation will have the following effects on OPEB related fiscal costs and revenues during the five year
measurement period. 2019 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 27
Page 4 of 5
2. Expenditures:
No measurable effects.
3. Revenues:
No measurable effects.
C. Estimated Fiscal Impact: Other Government Entities (other than the retirement systems or OPEB)
(Prepared by Bradley Cryer, Director of Local Government Services, LLA)
1. Narrative
From time to time, legislation is proposed that has an indirect effect on cash flows associated with other government entities
(other than the retirement systems or OPEB). Table C shows the estimated fiscal impact of the proposed legislation on such
government entities. A fiscal cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. Fiscal savings are denoted by “Decrease”
or a negative number.
Fiscal Costs for Other Government Entities: Table C
EXPENDITURES 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
REVENUES 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
The proposed legislation will have the following effects on fiscal costs and revenues related to other government entities
during the five year measurement period.
2. Expenditures:
No measurable effects.
3. Revenues:
No measurable effects.
D. Estimated Fiscal Impact − All Retirement Systems, OPEB, and All Government Entities
(Prepared by LLA)
1. Narrative
Table D shows the estimated fiscal impact of the proposed legislation on all government entities within the state of Louisiana.
Cell values in Table D are the sum of the respective cell values in Table A, table B, and Table C. A fiscal cost is denoted by
“Increase” or a positive number. F iscal savings are denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. A revenue increase is
denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. A revenue decrease is denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number.
2019 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 27
Page 5 of 5
Total Fiscal Cost: Table D (Cumulative Costs from Tables A, B, & C)
EXPENDITURES 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
Annual Total Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
REVENUES 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated 0 Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total $ 0 Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
Credentials of the Signatory Staff:
James J. Rizzo is a Senior Consultant and Actuary with Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company, which is currently serving as the actuary
for the Louisiana Legislative Auditor. He is an Enrolled Actuary, a member of the American Academy of Actuaries, an Associate of
the Society of Actuaries and has met the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries necessary to render the
actuarial opinion contained herein.
Actuarial Disclosure: Risks Associated with Measuring Costs
This Actuarial Note is an actuarial communication, and is required to include certain disclosures in compliance with Actuarial
Standards of Practice (ASOP) No. 51. Risk disclosures otherwise required by ASOP No. 51 do not apply to this Actuarial Note
because the proposed bill does not significantly change the types or levels of risks of the retirement system.
Information Pertaining to Article (10)(29(F) of the Louisiana Constitution
X
HB 27 contains a retirement system benefit provision having an actuarial cost.
A retired member of MERS who is a part-time elected official may receive more in benefits under HB 27 than what he would
have received without HB 27.
Dual Referral Relative to Total Fiscal Costs or Total Cash Flows:
The information presented below is based on information contained in Table D for the first three years following the 2019 regular
session.
Senate House
13.5.1 Applies to Senate or House Instruments. 6.8F Applies to Senate or House Instruments.
If an annual fiscal cost ≥ $100,000, then bill is
dual referred to:
If an annual General Fund fiscal cost ≥
$100,000, then the bill is dual referred to:
Dual Referral: Senate Finance Dual Referral to Appropriations
13.5.2 Applies to Senate or House Instruments. 6.8G Applies to Senate Instruments only.
If an annual tax or fee change ≥ $500,000,
then the bill is dual referred to:
If a net fee decrease occurs or if an increase in
annual fees and taxes ≥ $500,000, then the bill is
dual referred to:
Dual Referral: Revenue and Fiscal Affairs
Dual Referral: Ways and Means