Louisiana House Bill HB449

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/19
• Refer: 3/29/19
• Refer: 4/8/19
• Report Pass: 5/6/19

Caption

Provides for the classification of applicable fair market percentages for property subject to ad valorem taxation (EG NO IMPACT LF RV See Note)

Impact

The bill's impact revolves around its alignment with existing constitutional provisions concerning ad valorem taxation. By reclassifying property assessments based on fair market value, it aims to provide clarity and potentially establish a more predictable tax environment. This will help property owners and assessors in determining accurate property taxes. If passed, it would reinforce the existing laws but also ensure that property assessments are consistent across different classifications based on the specified values.

Summary

House Bill 449 concerns the classification of properties for ad valorem taxation in Louisiana, aiming to standardize the percentages used in property assessments based on fair market value. Designed to enact Chapter 2-A of Subtitle III of Title 47 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes, this bill outlines specific classifications of properties and the corresponding assessed value percentages, which are 10% for land and residential improvements, 15% for electric cooperative properties, and 25% for public service properties, among others. This law is set to come into effect only if a related constitutional amendment is approved by voters in a statewide election.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 449 is relatively neutral, as it primarily seeks to clarify and reinforce existing tax classifications rather than create major changes in taxation policy. Most discourse appears to focus on the technical aspects of tax classifications and their implications rather than a polarized debate. However, stakeholders in real estate and taxation might exhibit differing opinions based on how the changes could affect their financial responsibilities.

Contention

Notable points of contention appear to stem from the requirement that the bill's provisions be contingent on the successful passage of a proposed constitutional amendment. This could lead to debates regarding the desirability and feasibility of such an amendment among constituents and lawmakers. Additionally, questions may arise about the fairness of property classifications and how they impact different sectors of the community, particularly concerning the tax burden.