Louisiana House Bill HB494

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/19
• Refer: 3/29/19
• Refer: 4/8/19
• Report Pass: 4/16/19
• Engrossed: 5/2/19
• Refer: 5/6/19
• Report Pass: 5/20/19
• Enrolled: 6/3/19
• Chaptered: 6/11/19
• Passed: 6/11/19

Caption

Provides relative to the determination of where sales and use taxes are due on purchases of certain raw materials converted into asphaltic concrete (EN SEE FISC NOTE LF RV See Note)

Impact

The passage of HB 494 will amend existing state laws to clarify the tax obligations for contractors in road material construction. By establishing a framework for taxing when raw materials are deemed to be used in a certain jurisdiction, it could reduce confusion among contractors and governmental entities alike. This bill is particularly relevant for road construction projects that often span multiple jurisdictions and may have previously resulted in conflicting tax interpretations.

Summary

House Bill 494 focuses on establishing clear guidelines for determining where sales and use taxes are due concerning raw materials used in road construction, particularly asphaltic concrete. The bill specifies that the sales tax implications will depend on where title and possession of the materials are transferred and where they are ultimately used. This aims to simplify the tax process for road contractors and ensure proper tax collection for local governments.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 494 appears supportive, particularly among legislators focused on streamlining tax systems for the construction industry. The unification of tax processes is seen as a move that promotes efficiency and fairness among contractors. However, there may be concerns from local governments regarding the implications this bill has on their revenue sources when it comes to assessing local taxes.

Contention

While HB 494 aims to create a standardized approach to tax obligations, there may be potential contention around the interpretations of tax jurisdictions and contractor compliance. Local authorities may worry about the effects of reduced tax revenue from road contracts and the operational impact this could have on local funding and budget allocations. Balancing state and local interests will be crucial to address any disagreements that arise.