Louisiana House Bill HB549

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/29/19
• Refer: 3/29/19
• Refer: 4/8/19

Caption

Adds structures located in opportunity zones to the property eligible to participate in the Restoration Tax Abatement program (OR SEE FISC NOTE LF RV)

Impact

The enactment of HB 549 is expected to positively impact state laws concerning property tax management and local economic development initiatives. By incorporating opportunity zones into the Restoration Tax Abatement framework, the bill enhances incentives for property owners to undertake improvements in areas that need revitalization. This targeted support aims to bolster both community growth and the overall tax base in Louisiana by mitigating financial burdens during the developmental phase of property improvements.

Summary

House Bill 549 expands the Restoration Tax Abatement program in Louisiana by including structures located in opportunity zones as eligible properties. The bill aims to facilitate the expansion, restoration, improvement, and development of both commercial and residential properties within designated zones that have historically faced economic challenges. By allowing property owners in these areas to pay ad valorem taxes based on the assessed value of their properties prior to development for a period of five years, the legislation seeks to stimulate local economies and encourage investment in underserved communities.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 549 is largely supportive, with many legislators recognizing the potential benefits of economic revitalization associated with revitalizing underdeveloped areas. Stakeholders, particularly in local governments and economic development sectors, view this as a proactive step toward enhancing property investment. However, there may be some contention surrounding the effectiveness of such incentives and whether they will produce the intended economic outcomes in opportunity zones, where past efforts have had mixed results.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the effectiveness of tax abatement programs in genuinely fostering economic growth as opposed to merely delaying tax revenue. Critics may argue that without adequate oversight, such incentives could lead to misuse or fail to produce sustainable development. Discussions may also arise regarding the equity of allocating state resources towards tax exemptions in certain neighborhoods while potentially neglecting others with pressing development needs.