Louisiana Senate Bill SCR131

Louisiana 2019 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/30/19
• Passed: 5/31/19
• Engrossed: 6/2/19

Caption

Memorializes Congress to provide adequate funding to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for the completion of deepening the Mississippi River Ship Channel to fifty feet.

Impact

The resolution emphasizes that the deepening of the shipping channel could significantly increase its water-carrying capacity, which is presently vital to the national economy. It notes that every additional foot of draft could result in an increase of one million dollars in cargo capacity per vessel. As the Mississippi River is already a significant corridor for goods, improvements could bolster economic opportunities across various sectors and enhance jobs directly associated with shipping and trade activities on the river.

Summary

SCR131, a Senate Concurrent Resolution, seeks to memorialize the United States Congress to allocate sufficient funding for the United States Army Corps of Engineers to deepen the Mississippi River Ship Channel to fifty feet. This project is described as a crucial infrastructure improvement aimed at enhancing the economic prosperity of the nation by allowing larger Post-Panamax ships to navigate the river, thereby expanding trade access. Proponents argue that this deepening is essential not only for Louisiana but also for the economic benefit of thirty-one states that rely on the Mississippi for transportation and trade.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SCR131 appears to be positive, as evidenced by its bipartisan support reflected in the Senate vote, which concluded with 36 yeas and no nays. Supporters—including key legislators and business interests—regard the bill as essential for maintaining competitive shipping capabilities in light of recent expansions in other major shipping routes, like the Panama Canal.

Contention

While the resolution currently enjoys widespread support, notable points of contention could arise if concerns emerge regarding environmental implications or funding allocation priorities. Stakeholders may critique the reliance on federal funding for state infrastructure projects, underscoring that decisions about infrastructural improvements can often become politicized and lead to debates about resource distribution among states.