Louisiana House Bill HR43

Louisiana 2020 1st Special Session

• Introduced: 6/23/20
• Refer: 6/23/20

Caption

Requests the attorney general to withdraw the state of Louisiana from the lawsuit challenging the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Impact

The resolution draws attention to the significant impact that the PPACA has had on reducing the number of uninsured individuals in Louisiana. Reportedly, the state experienced a drastic decline of over thirty percent in uninsured rates between 2013 and 2016, attributing this improvement to the implementation of the ACA’s provisions. If Louisiana were to withdraw from the lawsuit and subsequently see the PPACA invalidated, it would not only affect healthcare access for many citizens but would also result in a significant financial burden on the state, projected at over three billion dollars in lost federal revenue.

Summary

House Resolution 43 requests the Attorney General of Louisiana to withdraw from the lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). This resolution stems from concerns that the invalidation of the Act would lead to substantial negative consequences for health coverage in the state, particularly for low-income individuals who greatly benefit from Medicaid expansion and other provisions established under the Act.

Sentiment

The sentiment expressed in the legislative discussions surrounding HR43 appears to lean towards the protection of Louisiana residents' health and welfare. Supporters of the resolution argue that moving forward with the lawsuit would severely jeopardize health provisions and access to coverage for those with pre-existing conditions. This concern resonates strongly among local lawmakers and advocacy groups that stress the need for continued support of the ACA's initiatives.

Contention

Notably, the resolution is indicative of a broader political contention regarding the ACA. Some legislators argue that the suit could threaten crucial health protections, while others may hold differing views on the role of federal versus state healthcare policies. The resolution not only addresses immediate health concerns but also reflects the ongoing debate about healthcare policy and state involvement in litigation that affects citizen welfare.