2020 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 21
Page 1 of 8
House Bill 21 HLS 20RS-117
Original
Author: Representative Bacala
Date: March 3, 2020
LLA Note HB 21.01
Organizations Affected:
Municipal Police Employees’
Retirement System
OR INCREASE APV
This Note has been prepared by the Actuarial Services Department of the
Louisiana Legislative Auditor (LLA) with assistance from either the Fiscal Notes
staff of the Legislative Auditor or staff of the Legislative Fiscal Office (LFO). The
attachment of this Note provides compliance with the requirements of R.S. 24:521
as amended by Act 353 of the 2016 Regular Session.
Lowell P. Good, ASA, EA, MAAA
Actuarial Services Manager
Bill Header: RETIREMENT/MUNICIPAL POL: Provides relative to membership and benefits of the Municipal Police Employees’
Retirement System.
Cost Summary:
The estimated net actuarial and fiscal impact of this proposed legislation on the retirement systems and their plan sponsors is
summarized below. Net actuarial costs pertain to estimated changes in the net actuarial present value of future benefit payments and
administrative expenses incurred by the retirement system. Net fiscal costs or savings pertain to changes to all cash flows over the
next five year period including retirement system cash flows, OPEB cash flows, or cash flows related to local and state government
entities.
An increase in actuarial costs is denoted throughout the actuarial note by “Increase” or a positive number. Actuarial savings are
denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. An increase in expenditures or revenues (fiscal impact) is denoted by “Increase” or a
positive number. A decrease in expenditures or revenues is denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number.
Estimated Actuarial Impact:
The top part of the following chart shows the estimated change in the net actuarial present value of future benefit payments and
expenses, if any, attributable to the proposed legislation. The bottom part shows the effect on cash flows (i.e., contributions, benefit
payments, and administrative expenses).
Net Actuarial Costs (Liabilities) Pertaining to: Net Actuarial Cost
The Retirement Systems Increase
Other Post-employment Benefits (OPEB) 0
Total Increase
Five Year Net Fiscal Cost Pertaining to: Expenditures Revenues
The Retirement Systems Increase Increase
Other Post-employment Benefits (OPEB) 0 0
Local Government Entities Increase 0
State Government Entities 0 0
Total Increase Increase
Bill Information
Current Law
The current laws for the provisions affected by HB 21 include:
1. Current law provides that a person who is 50 years old or older does not become a member in the Municipal Police
Employees’ Retirement System (MPERS) upon employment.
2. Current law requires an employee to receive a physical examination before he becomes a member. Current law requires
submission of the examination and waivers of preexisting conditions to MPERS within six months after employment. A
member who does not timely submit these documents is a member for purposes of receiving regular benefits but is not
eligible for disability benefits until the documents are submitted.
3. Current law provides that a person ceases to be a member of MPERS if he is absent from service for more than five years
and is not entitled to a deferred annuity as provided for by the current law.
4. Current law provides for payment of retirement benefits to a surviving spouse. These benefits cease if the spouse
remarries before age 60.
5. Current law provides for survivor benefits for a member who has at least 10 years of service credit.
2020 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 21
Page 2 of 8
Proposed Law
The provisions under HB 21 corresponding to the above current laws are:
1. HB 21 removes the age restriction for persons hired on or after July 1, 2021.
2. HB 21 provides that a person hired after June 30, 2021, who has not timely submitted the documents is a member
eligible to begin vesting for regular benefits but is not eligible to begin vesting for disability benefits for an injury not
incurred in the line of duty until the documentation is received. In addition, HB 21 requires completion of a new physical
examination if the employee has a break in service longer than one year. If a physical examination is not completed
because the employer refused to pay for the physical examination, the employer is liable for any disability benefit to
which the member would be entitled.
3. HB 21 provides that a person does not cease to be a member of the system if (i) he is absent from service for more than
five years on or before June 30, 2021, and (ii) is not entitled to a deferred annuity as provided for by the current law.
4. HB 21 provides that benefits payable to the surviving spouse cease if the spouse remarries before age 55. It also requires
a surviving spouse under the age of 55 who receives survivor benefits to submit to the board of trustees, by October 1st
of every year beginning with the second October 1st following the member's death, a notarized statement attesting his
marital status throughout the prior fiscal year. If the statement is not submitted in time, the benefit will be discontinued
without retroactive reimbursement, until the statement is submitted. If the spouse does not submit the statement for the
remainder of the calendar year, the board of trustees may revoke his rights to survivor benefits.
5. HB 21 provides that if a member is killed in the line of duty, the requirement to have at least 10 years of service in
MPERS does not apply.
The following provisions are also contained in HB 21:
a. HB 21 defines “full-time” as meaning an employment on a permanent, regularly scheduled basis for at least an average
of thirty hours per week, and requires an elected chief of police to be full-time in order to be considered an employee.
b. HB 21 provides for the payment of survivors benefits to a special needs trust created for a disabled child.
c. HB 21 requires the claims for the survivor benefits for a member who dies after June 30, 2021 to be filed within one year
of the death.
d. A rehired retiree of MPERS reemployed on or after July 1, 2021 will receive a reduction in his pension benefit if the sum
of his pension benefit and his reemployment earnings exceeds his final average compensation. He will not be considered
a member of MPERS. The rehired retiree and his employer will contribute to MPERS. He will not receive any additional
service credit nor will he accrued any additional benefits. Upon termination of his re-employment, the member will
receive a refund of his employee contributions made during his period of re-employment without interest. MPERS will
retain the employer contributions made during the rehired employee’s period of re-employment.
e. HB 21 provides as follows relative to disability retirements from MPERS:
1. Requires that claims for disability benefits by a member disabled after June 30, 2021 be filed within one year from
the date of disability.
2. Requires MPERS to pay for any medical examination that it may require to determine continued eligibility for a
disability retirement benefit.
3. Requires the board of trustees to use all reasonable means to collect the benefits paid by MPERS to an individual
who was not due the benefit. The prescriptive period is three years from the date of payment, except in the case of
fraud where the prescriptive period is thirty years from the date of payment.
f. HB 21 provides that a member who is married under a community property regime will provide consent of his spouse or
an affidavit of unknown location, before he can elect his retirement benefits.
g. HB 21 clarifies how benefits are determined when a member has service in more than one subplan. For members whose
first employment making them eligible for membership in the subplan occurs on or after July 1, 2021, retirement benefits
and eligibility for each portion of the benefit are based on the requirements of the subplan under which it was accrued.
Implications of the Proposed Changes
The provisions under HB 21 with cost implications are:
1. It is more likely there will be new covered employees hired who are age 50 and older.
2. It is more likely physical examinations and other documentation will be submitted in a timely manner to obtain coverage
for disability benefits.
3. It is more likely a former employee will return after an absence of over five years and eventually be eligible for benefits.
4. It is more likely that survivor benefits will continue to be paid to survivors who remarry.
5. Survivors of members who die in the line of duty with fewer than 10 years of service will be eligible for retirement
benefits. 2020 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 21
Page 3 of 8
6. Defining “full time” as an average of at least 30 hours a week will make part-time work less attractive to those who want
to earn pension benefits.
7. Requiring employer contributions to be paid for rehired retirees will remove the incentive for employers to hire retirees
rather than new employees; and requiring a benefit reduction for rehired retirees will reduce the incentive for members to
retire early then return to work.
8. Requiring timely physical examinations and documentation should minimize payments for members who shouldn’t
qualify for disability benefits.
The net effect of these changes would be an expected increase in actuarial liabilities and costs.
I. ACTUARIAL IMPACT ON RETIREMENT SYSTEMS AND OPEB [Completed by LLA]
A. Analysis of Net Actuarial Costs
(Prepared by LLA)
This section of the actuarial note pertains to net actuarial costs or savings associated with the retirement systems and with OPEB.
1. Retirement Systems
The net actuarial cost or savings of the proposed legislation associated with the retirement systems is estimated to be an
increase in cost. The actuary’s analysis is summarized below.
a) HB 21 removes the age restriction for persons hired on or after July 1, 2021. A person who is hired and becomes a
member at age fifty or later, will be eligible for retirement benefits after 10 to 12 years, depending on whether he is in
the Hazardous Duty Subplan (12 years or more at age 55) or the Nonhazardous Duty Subplan (10 years or more at age
60). This provision of the proposed bill is not expected to increase the number of covered employees, but increase the
average of new hires enrolling into the System. This makes the actuarial cost somewhat higher than for new members
hired at a younger age.
b) A person hired after June 30, 2021, who does not timely submit the required documents is not eligible to begin vesting
for disability benefits until such documents are received. In addition, a new physical examination will be required if the
employee has a break in service longer than one year. The employer will be liable for any disability benefit if a physical
examination is not completed because the employer refused to pay for the physical examination. These restrictions on
disability benefits have the potential to reduce actuarial liabilities, either by preventing coverage of a new employee who
would not pass the physical, or by denying eligibility for disability benefits.
c) The provision that a person ceases to be a member of MPERS if he is absent from service for more than five years and is
not entitled to a deferred annuity as provided for by the current law will be removed after June 30, 2021. If such a
person returns to service, his benefit will be larger and his retirement date earlier by including those earlier years of
service. Keeping such members in MPERS increases the actuarial liability.
d) HB 21 moves the restriction on remarrying down from age 60 to age 55 for surviving spouses. Continuing to pay
benefits to surviving spouses who remarry between the ages of 55 and 60 increases the actuarial liability. However,
requiring an annual notarized statement attesting to marital status could reduce payments in some cases.
e) The 10 years of service requirement for survivor benefits is not applicable when a member is killed in the line of duty.
Paying survivor benefits when a member is killed in the line of duty before he has 10 years of service increases the
actuarial liability.
f) Pension benefits may be reduced for some rehired retirees. Requiring employer contributions will remove the incentive
for employers to hire retirees rather than new employees, and requiring a benefit reduction will reduce the incentive for
members to retire early then return to work. Overall removing the incentive to retire early should reduce the actuarial
liability.
g) Defining “full time” as an average of at least 30 hours a week, will limit anti-selection by part time elected chiefs of
police and other members who could have part-time service early in their careers and move to full time service later with
much higher compensation. This change will decrease the actuarial liability.
h) Requiring timely physical examinations and documentation should minimize payments for members who shouldn’t
qualify for disability benefits. This change should reduce the actuarial liability. Requiring the system to pay for exams
increases cost, however reducing benefits to those no longer disabled should offset the cost.
i) Limiting the number of years of overpayments that can be collected may reduce recoveries; however, recovering
overpayments can be difficult and costly, so the impact is not clear.
j) Requiring proof related to marital status with regard to community property can prevent being forced to overpay benefits
by having to make payments to a second beneficiary.
2. Other Post-employment Benefits (OPEB)
The net actuarial cost or savings of the proposed legislation associated with OPEB, including retiree health insurance
premiums, is estimated to be $0. The actuary’s analysis is summarized below.
2020 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 21
Page 4 of 8
The liability for post-retirement medical insurance subsidies provided to retirees is not affected by any of the provisions
contained in HB 21. Retiree medical insurance subsidies are adopted by the local employers and are not affected by the
provisions of this proposed bill.
B. Actuarial Data, Methods and Assumptions
(Prepared by LLA)
Unless indicated otherwise, the actuarial note for the proposed legislation was prepared using actuarial data, methods, and
assumptions as disclosed in the most recent actuarial valuation report adopted by the Public Retirement Systems’ Actuarial
Committee (PRSAC). The data, methods and assumptions are being used to provide consistency with the actuary for the
retirement system who may also be providing testimony to the Senate and House retirement committees. With certain exceptions,
the actuary for the LLA finds the assumptions used by the retirement systems and PRSAC to be reasonable.
C. Actuarial Caveat
(Prepared by LLA)
There is nothing in the proposed legislation that will compromise the signing actuary’s ability to present an unbiased statement of
actuarial opinion.
II. FISCAL IMPACT ON RETIREMENT SYSTEMS AND OPEB [Completed by LLA]
This section of the actuarial note pertains to fiscal (annual) costs or savings associated with the retirement systems (Table A) and with
OPEB (Table B). Fiscal costs or savings in Table A include benefit-related actuarial costs and administrative costs incurred by the
retirement systems.
A. Estimated Fiscal Impact – Retirement Systems
(Prepared by LLA)
1. Narrative
Table A shows the estimated fiscal impact of the proposed legislation on the retirement systems and the government entities
that sponsor them. A fiscal cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. Fiscal savings are denoted by “Decrease” or
a negative number. A revenue increase is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. A revenue decrease is denoted by
“Decrease” or a negative number.
Retirement System Fiscal Cost: Table A EXPENDITURES 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-255 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
Annual Total Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
REVENUES 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-255 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase
All expenditures for employer contributions are reflected on a single line in the table above. The actual sources of funding
(e.g., Federal Funds, State General Fund) may vary by employer and are not differentiated on the table.
The proposed legislation will have the following effects on retirement related fiscal costs and revenues during the five year
measurement period.
2. Expenditures:
a. Expenditures by MPERS (Agy Self Generated) will likely increase, possibly beginning in 2020-21 if during that period
more employees are expected to participate in MPERS and accrue benefits. Therefore, benefit payments for MPERS will
likely be larger than they are currently, even when considering the likely reduction in the benefits paid for some of the
rehired retiree of MPERS reemployed on or after July 1, 2021.
b. Expenditures from the Local Funds will likely increase, possibly beginning in 2020-21 if during that period more
contributions are made. In addition, employer contributions will increase when a retiree is employed.
2020 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 21
Page 5 of 8
3. Revenues:
MPERS revenues (Agy Self-Generated) will likely increase, possibly beginning in 2020-21 if during that period more
contributions are received. In addition, employer and employee contributions received will increase when a retiree is
employed.
B. Estimated Fiscal Impact – OPEB
(Prepared by LLA)
1. Narrative
Table B shows the estimated fiscal impact of the proposed legislation on actuarial benefit and administrative costs or savings
associated with OPEB and the government entities that sponsor these benefit programs. A fiscal cost is denoted by
“Increase” or a positive number. Fiscal savings are denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. A revenue increase is
denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. A revenue decrease is denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number.
OPEB Fiscal Cost: Table B EXPENDITURES 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-255 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
REVENUES 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-255 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
All expenditures for employer contributions are reflected on a single line in the table above. The actual sources of funding
(e.g., Federal Funds, State General Fund) may vary by employer and are not differentiated on the table.
The proposed legislation will have the following effects on OPEB related fiscal costs and revenues during the five year
measurement period.
2. Expenditures:
No measurable effects.
3. Revenues:
No measurable effects.
III. FISCAL IMPACT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENTITIES [Completed by LLA]
This section of the actuarial note pertains to annual fiscal costs, cost savings, and revenue impacts incurred by local government
entities other than those included in Tables A and B. See Table C.
Estimated Fiscal Impact - Local Government Entities (other than the impact included in Tables A and B)
(Prepared by Bradley Cryer, Director of Local Government Services)
1. Narrative
From time to time, legislation is proposed that has an indirect effect on expenditures and revenues associated with local
government entities (other than the impact included in Tables A and B). Table C shows the estimated fiscal impact of the
proposed legislation on such local government entities. A fiscal cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. Fiscal
savings are denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. A revenue increase is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number.
A revenue decrease is denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number.
2020 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 21
Page 6 of 8
Fiscal Costs for Local Government Entities: Table C EXPENDITURES 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
REVENUES 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
The proposed legislation will have the following effects on fiscal costs and revenues related to local government entities
during the five year measurement period.
2. Expenditures:
The bill may have an impact on employee retention/hiring, along with related costs; however, such an impact cannot be
accurately quantified.
3. Revenues:
No measurable effects.
IV. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE GOVERNMENT ENTITIES [Completed by LFO]
This section of the actuarial note pertains to annual fiscal costs, cost savings, and revenue impacts incurred by state government
entities other than those included in Tables A and B. See Table D.
Estimated Fiscal Impact − State Government Entities (other than the impact included in Tables A and B)
(Prepared by John Carpenter, Legislative Fiscal Officer)
1. Narrative
Legislation may be proposed that has an indirect effect on expenditures and revenues associated with state government
entities (other than the impact included in Tables A and B). Table D shows the estimated fiscal impact of the proposed
legislation on such state government entities. A fiscal cost is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. Fiscal savings are
denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number. A revenue increase is denoted by “Increase” or a positive number. A revenue
decrease is denoted by “Decrease” or a negative number.
Fiscal Costs for State Government Entities: Table D EXPENDITURES 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
REVENUES 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 5 Year Total
State General Fund $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Agy Self Generated 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stat Deds/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Federal Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Local Funds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
The proposed legislation will have the following effects on fiscal costs and revenues related to state government entities
during the five year measurement period.
2020 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 21
Page 7 of 8
2. Expenditures:
N/A - This bill only impacts local government and therefore, has no state impact. The LFO does not review local government
bills.
3. Revenues:
N/A - This bill only impacts local government and therefore, has no state impact. The LFO does not review local government
bills.
Credentials of the Signatory Staff:
Lowell P. Good is the Actuary for the Louisiana Legislative Auditor. He is an Enrolled Actuary, a member of the American Academy
of Actuaries, an Associate of the Society of Actuaries and has met the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries
necessary to render the actuarial opinion contained herein.
James J. Rizzo is a Senior Consultant and Actuary with Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company, which currently serves as staff for the
Actuarial Services Department of the Louisiana Legislative Auditor. He is an Enrolled Actuary, a member of the American Academy
of Actuaries, an Associate of the Society of Actuaries and has met the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries
necessary to render the actuarial opinion contained herein.
Actuarial Disclosure: Risks Associated with Measuring Costs
This Actuarial Note is an actuarial communication, and is required to include certain disclosures in compliance with Actuarial
Standards of Practice (ASOP) No. 51.
A full actuarial determination of the retirement system’s costs, actuarially determined contributions and accrued liability require the
use of assumptions regarding future economic and demographic events. The assumptions used to determine the retirement system’s
contribution requirement and accrued liability are summarized in the system’s most recent Actuarial Valuation Report accepted by the
respective retirement board and by the Public Retirement Systems’ Actuarial Committee (PRSAC).
The actual emerging future experience, such as a retirement fund’s future investment returns, may differ from the assumptions. To the
extent that emerging future experience differs from the assumptions, the resulting shortfalls (or gains) must be recognized in future
years by future taxpayers. Future actuarial measurements may also differ significantly from the current measurements due to other
factors: changes in economic or demographic assumptions; increases or decreases expected as part of the natural operation of the
methodology used for these measurements (such as the end of an amortization period; or additional cost or contribution requirements
based on the system’s funded status); and changes in plan provisions or applicable law.
Examples of risk that may reasonably be anticipated to significantly affect the plan’s future financial condition include:
1. Investment risk – actual investment returns may differ from the expected returns (assumptions);
2. Contribution risk – actual contributions may differ from expected future contributions. For example, actual contributions
may not be made in accordance with the plan’s funding policy or material changes may occur in the anticipated number of
covered employees, covered payroll, or other relevant contribution base;
3. Salary and Payroll risk – actual salaries and total payroll may differ from expected, resulting in actual future accrued liability
and contributions differing from expected;
4. Longevity and life expectancy risk – members may live longer or shorter than expected and receive pensions for a period of
time other than assumed;
5. Other demographic risks – members may terminate, retire or become disabled at times or with benefits other than assumed,
resulting in actual future accrued liability and contributions differing from expected.
The scope of an Actuarial Note prepared for the Louisiana Legislature does not include an analysis of the potential range of such
future measurements or a quantitative measurement of the future risks of not achieving the assumptions. In certain circumstances,
detailed or quantitative assessments of one or more of these risks as well as various plan maturity measures and historical actuarial
measurements may be requested from the actuary. Additional risk assessments are generally outside the scope of an Actuarial
Note. Additional assessments may include stress tests, scenario tests, sensitivity tests, stochastic modeling, and a comparison of the
present value of accrued benefits at low-risk discount rates with the actuarial accrued liability.
However, the general cost-effects of emerging experience deviating from assumptions can be known. For example, the investment
return since the most recent actuarial valuation may be less (or more) than the assumed rate, or a cost-of-living adjustment may be
more (or less) than the assumed rate, or life expectancy may be improving (or worsening) compared to what is assumed. In each of
these situations, the cost of the plan can be expected to increase (or decrease).
The use of reasonable assumptions and the timely receipt of the actuarially determined contributions are critical to support the
financial health of the plan. However, employer contributions made at the actuarially determined rate do not necessarily guarantee
benefit security.
2020 REGULAR SESSION
ACTUARIAL NOTE HB 21
Page 8 of 8
Information Pertaining to Article (10)(29(F) of the Louisiana Constitution
X
HB 21 contains a retirement system benefit provision having an actuarial cost.
Some members of the Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System could receive a larger benefit with the enactment of
HB 21 than what they would have received without HB 21.
Dual Referral Relative to Total Fiscal Costs or Total Cash Flows:
The information presented below is based on information contained in Tables A, B, C, and D for the first three years following the
2020 regular session.
Senate House
13.5.1 Applies to Senate or House Instruments. 6.8F Applies to Senate or House Instruments.
If an annual fiscal cost ≥ $100,000, then bill is
dual referred to:
If an annual General Fund fiscal cost ≥
$100,000, then the bill is dual referred to:
Dual Referral: Senate Finance Dual Referral to Appropriations
13.5.2 Applies to Senate or House Instruments. 6.8G Applies to Senate Instruments only.
If an annual tax or fee change ≥ $500,000,
then the bill is dual referred to:
If a net fee decrease occurs or if an increase in
annual fees and taxes ≥ $500,000, then the bill is
dual referred to:
Dual Referral: Revenue and Fiscal Affairs
Dual Referral: Ways and Mea